Re: Open letter to YoY, Sing, Lee, and the less-than-sincerely confused, but mostly YoY -- Dearborn County Public Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8 ]

Subject: Re: Open letter to YoY, Sing, Lee, and the less-than-sincerely confused, but mostly YoY

Author:
Sue Brewington

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10:35:15 10/10/11 Mon
In reply to: yoy 's message, "Re: Open letter to YoY, Sing, Lee, and the less-than-sincerely confused, but mostly YoY" on 10:07:52 10/10/11 Mon

I'm still amazed at the folks that keep repeating "all he had to do was get a mental health evaluation". If you read the divorce decree you should know that wasn't all he had to do. One more time, we are talking about a man with a perfect record with the children. It's all been written before: no reports of abuse of any kind, no child services reports, no police reports, no complaints to the court about problems, no attempt to change the visitation schedule, and no recommendation by the psychologist that Dan was dangerous and should not see his children. Dan was denied an evaluation case file by the first psychologist and has not seen it to this day, even though the psychologist has testified that Dan was entitled to it by contract. Why would the results from a 2nd court appointed psychologist be any different. Then he could have 2 case files out there that he was not "entitled" to see. There was no discussion about Dan losing his children or that he was a danger to them at the divorce hearing.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Re: Open letter to YoY, Sing, Lee, and the less-than-sincerely confused, but mostly YoY	give it up	11:03:39 10/10/11 Mon

Re: Open letter to YoY, Sing, Lee, and the less-than-sincerely confused, but mostly YoY	yoy	15:56:47 10/10/11 Mon