Re: Bail Hearing -- Dearborn County Public Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, [8] ]

Subject: Re: Bail Hearing

Author:
Matt Brewington

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:28:40 08/26/11 Fri
In reply to: thankyou 's message, "Bail Hearing" on 18:02:45 08/19/11 Fri

No, bail was not set that high because of this alleged "drive by". This "information" was not presented to the court until after the original bond hearing. And, the information came from a habitual thief who appears to "talk" when he gets in trouble for stealing cars. The original "tip" came from crime stoppers.(the ANONYMOUS hot-line) No follow-up was done by the Cincinnati police, or the ATF agent who was apparently involved and no local, state, or federal charges were ever filed. And perhaps most importantly, NO CHARGES WERE FILED BY DEARBORN COUNTY NOR WAS ANY OF THIS "NEW" EVIDENCE IN THE DISCOVERIES PRESENTED BY THE PROSECUTOR TO BE USED AT TRIAL! Does anyone who knows anything about this witch hunt really believe that F. Aaron Negangard would not want to use this information at the trial of a man accused of intimidating a judge? Threatening a "drive-by" on a judge would be the height of intimidation. If this "informant" or these trumped up allegations slandering Dan Brewington had even a shred of validity, Negangard would have filed more charges in order to further "protect" the public from this "dangerous" person. The residents of Dearborn County should be making serious inquiries about how much taxpayer money is being spent by F. Aaron Negangard on his personal vendetta against an innocent man.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Re: Bail Hearing	?	17:15:47 08/26/11 Fri
Re: Bail Hearing -- Sue Brewington, 18:44:12 08/26/11 Fri