Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct: 
Feedback: 
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
| 19/05/26 8:57am | [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ] |
| Subject: Re: Anchors. | |
|
Author: Peter J Murphy happy |
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 17/07/08 12:06pm In reply to: Jenny (for Jim) 's message, "Re: Anchors." on 17/07/08 2:01am G`day Jenny and Jim, Sorry Jim I can`t agree with you matey.I`ve had a solicitor look into this at[cheap 1/2 25bucks] different times and I`ve also down loaded some of the more risque post and in his opinion there is nothing that has been said that would stand up in any court in this land of OZZ so I take it that being as we have the same system of law as the uk that would also apply there.I`ve said before I think that it has been just a couple of people with Victorian views on todays world that have influenced what is now taking place,plus the getting of some financial gain from advertising.As for the CHILDREN looking into this site for teaching purposes ,that`s a load of old bollocks,there are plenty of other sites that would be more educational than this one,so I for one do not believe the reason that has been put up,that`s my opinion.P J in the land of endless sunshine. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] |
| Subject | Author | Date |
| Re: Anchors. | Peter J Murphy happy | 17/07/08 1:26pm |
| Re: Anchors. | john strange (4 Peter) | 18/07/08 6:53am |