VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

18/05/26 11:54pmLogin ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]345678910 ]
Subject: Re: Anchors.


Author:
R COOK (OH REALLY?)
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 17/07/08 4:26pm
In reply to: albert bishop 's message, "Anchors." on 10/06/08 9:41am

in answer to your first point you not interesred in football louts.you had enough to say when you supported all your imaginaries on that incident.i am not interested in hatton or mulhearn.as far as thatcher goes and the decline in the southend of liverpool.if the likes of you would have kept her in power before long the same decline would have had much further reaches.oh yes as far north as sunny southport,she or her government didnt give a toss where you come from.as a former seaman like yourself if you hadnt been given the chance to serve your time from deck boy upwards.without the backing and insistence of your seamans union you would have got knowhere.so dont mention iron horse to me.because if she had been around in the 50s@60s she would have done away with the only tool you had against your employer.i am not and never was a member or supporter of militants.in this city.but remember this when you walk the walk.up until the argentinians surrender mid june 40 merchant ships totalling over 50.000 grt reached the south atlantic.without them the deflated r.f.a. fleet wouldnt have been big enough to win iron horses biggest day and she couldnt have sustained her force and won her war. she would have been defeated and ousted.thatcher and her government wouldnt invest in an r.f.a. fleet.i waved no flags.i had a very good friend who was chief steward abord the atlantic conveyer sunk by exocet.sadely no longer with us.i dont mince it sammy i say it as i see it.without the merchant men she would not have won her war 8000 miles away in the south atlantic.im not proud of thatcher im proud of the job once again carried out by the merchant navy.so come on sammy the seal. lets have a big round of applause for our merchant men,maybe even a little balance of the ball on the nose you are an entertainer. cookie

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Re: Anchors.Sammy Hughes (Mrs T HERO)17/07/08 7:19pm


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.