What did that FB post state was the reason? -- The Unofficial Unmoderated MAO Message Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, [8], 9, 10 ]

Subject: What did that FB post state was the reason?

Author:
No name

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 13:07:45 12/20/19 Fri
In reply to: Owner/Moderator 's message, "CONGRATULATIONS CAMILLE SCHEIER, MISS AMERICA 2020!!!" on 01:38:01 12/20/19 Fri

>Good evening everyone!
>
>What an evening. I would say that all's well that
>ends well. Congratulations to our new Miss America,
>Camille Schreier! I do think that she will be a good
>Miss America. I know there will be some debate about
>her talent. But, I suspect there is going to be more
>of a debate about the format itself tonight.
>
>There's a lot I have to say about the competition
>tonight. I'm sure it reflects the general mood of the
>viewing public. I did like the judges and I think
>they were very engaged and seemed to enjoy what they
>were doing. Other than that, the format needs to go.
>I don't know if it was obvious to the TV audience, but
>it was VERY quiet and subdued tonight. That was the
>least energetic pageant there ever was. There was no
>energy, everyone seemed so down, sans the Connecticut
>crowd. Congratulations, by the way, another top 5!
>You're getting to be a powerhouse state. It is nice
>to see some of the newer states starting to rise.
>Also, congratulations to Missouri. A first runner up
>and a second runner up in three years is quite an
>accomplishment. I was very proud of Victoria Hill,
>too. I am quite happy with Camille, too. I hated
>that we didn't get to see Brianna Mason or some of the
>others like Darynne Dahlem, but I wasn't surprised at
>any of the top 15.
>
>Much more tomorrow! I am looking forward to getting
>to know Camille as much as we can. Please share your
>thoughts about this craziness otherwise known as a
>competition. Also, I will respond to everyone's
>comments tomorrow as well.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> Subject: Talents, this year, were not to the same caliber in previous years. Having just the top 5 put the odds in favor of some entertainment.
Author: No name [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 14:24:15 12/20/19 Fri