Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, [8], 9, 10 ]

Subject: Who knows how the scoring was done under 2.0. Lack of transparency. Camille would have still won under 1.0. She interviews well, important under either version, and I’m sure she would have done well with SS. Author: No name [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 15:58:24 12/22/19 Sun In reply to: 's message, "I'm not so sure Jillian would've won under 1.0. In her pre-pageant interview, Jillian relates she merely finished top 10 at Miss Connecticut under the 1.0 rubric. Yet once 2.0 scoring was implemented, Jillian came back to win Miss Connecticut this year." on 15:17:58 12/22/19 Sun >>>Good evening everyone! >>> >>>What an evening. I would say that all's well that >>>ends well. Congratulations to our new Miss America, >>>Camille Schreier! I do think that she will be a good >>>Miss America. I know there will be some debate about >>>her talent. But, I suspect there is going to be more >>>of a debate about the format itself tonight. >>> >>>There's a lot I have to say about the competition >>>tonight. I'm sure it reflects the general mood of >the >>>viewing public. I did like the judges and I think >>>they were very engaged and seemed to enjoy what they >>>were doing. Other than that, the format needs to >go. >>>I don't know if it was obvious to the TV audience, >but >>>it was VERY quiet and subdued tonight. That was the >>>least energetic pageant there ever was. There was >no >>>energy, everyone seemed so down, sans the Connecticut >>>crowd. Congratulations, by the way, another top 5! >>>You're getting to be a powerhouse state. It is nice >>>to see some of the newer states starting to rise. >>>Also, congratulations to Missouri. A first runner up >>>and a second runner up in three years is quite an >>>accomplishment. I was very proud of Victoria Hill, >>>too. I am quite happy with Camille, too. I hated >>>that we didn't get to see Brianna Mason or some of >the >>>others like Darynne Dahlem, but I wasn't surprised at >>>any of the top 15. >>> >>>Much more tomorrow! I am looking forward to getting >>>to know Camille as much as we can. Please share your >>>thoughts about this craziness otherwise known as a >>>competition. Also, I will respond to everyone's >>>comments tomorrow as well. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> Subject: I've never seen Jillian compete in her state but I do know a lot of people from Connecticut and they told me that she completely transformed herself this past year. She lost weight, she worked out, she got the hair extensions and the nails done and the blond hair, the great wardrobe. She really really looked good relative to what she had looked before when I understand she was always a little chubby. That's what I heard but whatever. She really left no stone unturned in 2019. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: 17:12:18 12/22/19 Sun >>>Good evening everyone! >>> >>>What an evening. I would say that all's well that >>>ends well. Congratulations to our new Miss America, >>>Camille Schreier! I do think that she will be a good >>>Miss America. I know there will be some debate about >>>her talent. But, I suspect there is going to be more >>>of a debate about the format itself tonight. >>> >>>There's a lot I have to say about the competition >>>tonight. I'm sure it reflects the general mood of >the >>>viewing public. I did like the judges and I think >>>they were very engaged and seemed to enjoy what they >>>were doing. Other than that, the format needs to >go. >>>I don't know if it was obvious to the TV audience, >but >>>it was VERY quiet and subdued tonight. That was the >>>least energetic pageant there ever was. There was >no >>>energy, everyone seemed so down, sans the Connecticut >>>crowd. Congratulations, by the way, another top 5! >>>You're getting to be a powerhouse state. It is nice >>>to see some of the newer states starting to rise. >>>Also, congratulations to Missouri. A first runner up >>>and a second runner up in three years is quite an >>>accomplishment. I was very proud of Victoria Hill, >>>too. I am quite happy with Camille, too. I hated >>>that we didn't get to see Brianna Mason or some of >the >>>others like Darynne Dahlem, but I wasn't surprised at >>>any of the top 15. >>> >>>Much more tomorrow! I am looking forward to getting >>>to know Camille as much as we can. Please share your >>>thoughts about this craziness otherwise known as a >>>competition. Also, I will respond to everyone's >>>comments tomorrow as well.