One point. -- Ben's Message Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Monday, April 28, 07:21:58am [ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: One point.

Author:
Wade A. Tisthammer
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 07/14/04 4:00pm
In reply to: Wade A. Tisthammer 's message, "Is he?" on 07/14/04 3:47pm

>If the link give was
>correct, then nearly all experts now realize that even
>the famous Lucy to be just a 3-foot chimpanzee.

Since it seemed that nobody actually attacked the arguments presented in the link, I'll start. From what I've read it seems that the source misinterpreted some text regarding pygmy chimpanzees. It is not the case that nearly all experts believe Lucy to be a 3-foot chimpanzee. Whether or not it will be rejected like so many other would-be intermediates remains to be seen (though I suspect it will).

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date

Alernate explanations are easy to create Ben 07/14/04 4:15pm

They sure are. Wade A. Tisthammer 07/14/04 5:24pm

Damoclese rides again -- Damoclese, 07/14/04 8:04pm

Welcome back Kemosabe -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 07/15/04 9:31pm

Design? -- Damoclese, 07/16/04 8:18am

Disputable points -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 08/12/04 5:38pm

I don't think that -- Ben, 07/15/04 12:57am

Okay. -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 07/15/04 10:11pm

That's simply science -- Damoclese, 07/16/04 8:31am

You old softy. -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 08/12/04 5:43pm

Harding Place -- Damoclese, 08/15/04 11:56am

A rock...quite a bit more stable than hominid fossils -- Wade A. Tisthamjmer, 09/13/04 12:09am

More on Deceptive Design Theory -- Ben, 07/16/04 3:05pm

What's deceptive about it? -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 08/12/04 5:57pm

here's why -- Damoclese, 08/15/04 7:21pm

That's not what I was referring to -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 09/12/04 11:51pm

And a little more -- Damoclese, 07/18/04 7:08pm

And more -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 08/12/04 6:04pm

When were the laws of Mathematics started? And why? And how? -- QUITTNER, 08/13/04 1:30pm

reality check -- Duane, 08/23/04 1:05am

Re: reality check -- QUITTNER, 08/30/04 12:55pm

Duane -- grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr....., 08/31/04 7:25am

Interesting "explanations" -- QUITTNER, 08/31/04 1:37pm

whoops... -- Duane, 08/31/04 10:25pm

Interesting explanations -- QUITTNER, 09/ 3/04 2:28pm

Why post at all? -- Ben, 09/ 3/04 7:10pm
I agree -- Duane, 09/ 7/04 7:51am

...of little substance -- Damoclese, 08/15/04 12:01pm

Ingoring the substance -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 09/13/04 12:17am

Hitting the Bottle -- Damoclese, 09/13/04 1:23am

Of substance -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 09/14/04 3:48pm

Substance abuse -- Damoclese, 09/14/04 10:29pm

One quick comment -- Duane, 09/13/04 10:20am

One quick reply -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 09/14/04 4:06pm

A strange admission... -- Duane, 09/14/04 4:59pm