VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]345678910 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 18:15:47 05/17/02 Fri
Author: Murlin
Subject: Re: Better clubs for Natural Golf?
In reply to: John F. 's message, "Re: Better clubs for Natural Golf?" on 16:30:41 05/17/02 Fri

I can tell you from experience that I hit each of the "1" Iron Golf irons the same distance as my previous set. The only difference is that I hit each iron in the new set consistently. My main concern was the distance factor since all of the irons are the same length. I found out that what the web site says concerning distance is absolutely true. I am convinced that the length increases between clubs have no affect on distance, it just makes the longer clubs harder to hit.

>This is a very intriguing idea. What do you think the
>actual distance from club to club would be? It seems
>that this distance would be less. Maybe this would
>require the use of fewer irons, therefore permitting
>another fairway wood and\or wedge. I think that
>keeping the wedges fairly short is still necessary for
>the finesse shots in the short game. The wedges can
>all be of the same length to maintain a consistant
>swing.
>
>I feel that removing any variable (i.e. different
>postures for different club lengths) would be of some
>benefit. Imagine, using the exact same setup for
>every shot! What length are the irons? A
>conventional 6 iron length seems to make the most
>sense, because it is closest to being within the 3
>degree bending limit of most 3 and pw iron heads (in
>order to maintain a constant lie angle).
>
>Has anyone actually tried these clubs? I'll probably
>put together a set also. I have a set of Carbite
>irons that I've never used. With some shaft cutting
>and extending, lie angle adjusting and new grips, this
>shouldn't be too difficult or expensive. I only use
>one fairway wood, and my wedges are already a
>consistant length. I just hate to do this kind of
>experimenting after the season has started.
>
>John F.
>
>
>
>>Some very coarse calculations would indicate a 6%-12%
>>loss in clubhead speed from a 3 iron to a 7 iron based
>>upon length alone. That assumes a constant "swing
>>speed", i.e. angular velocity. However, since a 7 iron
>>head is considerably heavier than a 3 iron head, I
>>suspect that the "swing speed" of the shortened 3 iron
>>would be greater than that of a 7 iron of the same
>>length, due to the lower weight, yielding a much
>>greater clubhead speed which may well compensate for
>>the shorter length.
>>
>>On the other hand it may be that any success achieved
>>by using single length clubs is probably due to more
>>solid contact and increased comfort/confidence w/ the
>>"hard to hit" longer irons.
>>
>>That being said, I'm going to cobble together an old
>>set of heads I have w/ some cheap True Temper shafts
>>and try it out anyway!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:



[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.