This is where I disagree with you. It can't see it ever hitting us in the pocketbook because the University has never been committed to athletics in a real way. I wish it were different but there has never been any attempt to produce data that shows our alums care all that much. I would guess that less than 5 percent of the endowment is dedicated to athletics. We know that few facilites were paid for with external funds. The pocketbook has always been empty. I think the administration is comfortable with that. -- FORDHAM RAMS FOOTBALL FORUM

>

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, [8], 9, 10 ]

Subject: This is where I disagree with you. It can't see it ever hitting us in the pocketbook because the University has never been committed to athletics in a real way. I wish it were different but there has never been any attempt to produce data that shows our alums care all that much. I would guess that less than 5 percent of the endowment is dedicated to athletics. We know that few facilites were paid for with external funds. The pocketbook has always been empty. I think the administration is comfortable with that.

Author:
An Old Coach
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 08:01:33 12/11/04 Sat
In reply to: Rambacker 's message, "My comments were not made out of context. Every university in the country has financial restraints. We have a larger endowment than many schools that have long ago made a commitment to athletic facilties. It's a matter of priorities. Stop making excuses for poor decision making at Fordham. We need to move on a capital plan for athletics, and in the very near future. The natives(alums) are getting very restless and this will hit Fordham in the pocketbook sooner than later." on 20:46:16 12/10/04 Fri

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date

You're viewing the old FU. not the new. Over 20 years, we've built 1st rate dorms, a great library & renovated the campus. We have a President that for the 1st time commissioned a study to guide us into the future. He asked that athletics be part of this. When complete, the study will recommend competing in basketball at the highest level to promote FU. The Board/President have an open mind on this issue. If expectations are low, we'll get nothing. It's up to us to make our position clear. State of the art facilities CAN happen. It's time to get going & make it happen. (NT) Rambacker 09:00:55 12/11/04 Sat

I would like to think you are right. He is running out of credibility on the issue, though. I agree, Fordham is doing everything in a first rate manner, with one exception. To think that the administration is worried about a decrease in donations over athletics, is a little overstated. Were that the case, something would have been done a long time ago. (NT) -- An Old Coach, 11:06:00 12/11/04 Sat

Our future will be much clearer when the study is completed in October of 2005. In the interim, it's crucial to make our voices heard with Fr. McShane and the Board. (NT) -- Rambacker, 12:17:35 12/11/04 Sat