VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Tuesday, April 21, 07:53:58pmLogin ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234567[8]910 ]
Subject: I don't think that Elhams injury is disappointing, thanks god it did not affect her performance very much, about Missosology's choices, I do not agree with 90% of them, nothing has to do with Elham not included in it!


Author:
fan-man
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: Friday, October 21, 02:08:02pm
In reply to: La Chica 's message, "im disappointd about Elham's injury,but im proud shes doin er best.gd luck.About the missosology hotpicks,i noticed around 3 of 'em r below 5'6 even India is5'3.does it mean they appreciate beauty or their requirements r degraded than those of miss universe?.i certainly think its a goodsign,beauty wise i wouldnt see a girl whos 180cm as pretty,not the fact that im short but i thnk missuniverse should consider those who r shorter than 168, many girls last pageant were amazing but we nvr hear of them in the top.but i agree too short isnt of attractive either.what do u ppl thnk?" on Friday, October 21, 06:07:13am


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> Subject: However,I think that a beauty queen should be atleast168cm. It is not that I like tallerladies, actually I do, but I like short beautiful ones too, it is just that tallerladies have a better chance to stand-out on stage than shorter ones despite their beauty.


Author:
fan-man
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: Friday, October 21, 02:49:23pm


[ Post a Reply to This Message ]


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.