VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ]
Subject: Not to be picky but it was not really the 60th anniversary. MUC only really began in 2003 so to say it's been around for 60 years isn't correct. MUC cannot compare to the original Miss Canada which was more classy and less fleshy (if you will) than MUC.


Author:
G
 		[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 22:43:19 06/25/11 Sat
In reply to: Buster 's message, "Thanks for the review. I saw some pictures from the prelims and agree with you that there are a few standouts, Elishia, Brooke and Chelsea in particular. I also noticed Kim Savard LaForge for the first time. She's adorable. Also I agree that some of the gowns were, to be polite, unfortunate choices." on 20:48:24 06/24/11 Fri
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.