When it is was down to the final 2, Sahar and Samantha were my final 2 choices as well. Both were clearly the stand out delegates that night in my opinion, they rocked the pageant. Did their previous experience give them an advantage, probably yes. But I wasn't influenced by the candidates association with BOC or with Denis or whether she resided in Toronto. On that evening at 10:28 pm Samantha was selected as the representative of MUC for 2008. And I am very happy for her. -- Canadian Pageant Fans' HQ

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, [9] ]

Subject: When it is was down to the final 2, Sahar and Samantha were my final 2 choices as well. Both were clearly the stand out delegates that night in my opinion, they rocked the pageant. Did their previous experience give them an advantage, probably yes. But I wasn't influenced by the candidates association with BOC or with Denis or whether she resided in Toronto. On that evening at 10:28 pm Samantha was selected as the representative of MUC for 2008. And I am very happy for her.

Author:
mitch
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 19:28:58 04/30/08 Wed
In reply to: Former Pageant Contestant 's message, "Can we have a conversation about pageant ethics?" on 12:44:01 04/29/08 Tue

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date

pageant ethics another former pageant girl 14:01:03 05/03/08 Sat

I agree with this logic....BUT I do remember when Natalie competed her first year, she was also a favorite to win..but Venessa won. With that said, I think Natalie wanted to win, because what's the point of going into a pageant again, and making the same type of impact. If I were to make it to the top 10, and end up 4th runner up that year....the next year, if I compete, I'm going to want to win the title. So I would do anything in my control to improve my chance of winning....certain examples: Cynthia Olavarria, Miss Puerto Rico 2005; Crystle Stewart, Miss USA 2008; Natalie Glebova, Miss Canada 2005; Samantha Tajik, Miss Canada 2008 etc. If there are certain girls that seem to be favored....I would have to up my game to be noticed. Because if I lose my train of focus just because of favored attention to other girls...what's the point of competing. The minute I get to a competition, it's because I deserve to be there just like every other girl there. (NT) Desiree 15:42:25 05/05/08 Mon

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.