VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1]23456789 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Thu April 21, 2005 16:50:00
Author: '85
Subject: I'm biased! As senior in 1985 I was arrested for DWI. Name in paper the whole nine yards . Long and short of it is, I went to a trial and I was found not guilty. I had a heck of a time getting a job with this hanging over me, not to mention the many thousands of dollars in legal fees that I had to borrow to pay. In the end, nobody cared that I won and of course, the newspaper didn't print a follow-up so half the neghbordhood had me labele as a felon. . Its just so damaging to these young guys lives that I would hope schools and any of us would not jump to conclusions until there is an adjudication of the issue. These are young guys so I always am biased with the other end of the spectrum!.
In reply to: ace93 's message, "I think that it is somewhat tied to the accusation, but in this case guilt of the crime is not necessary for the suspension. I think it is safe to say that those at SBU asked Relph if he had been drinking. If he said yes then that right there alone is enough to suspend him, if they choose to, b/c he is not 21 yet. Couple that with the fact that he was driving and the suspension, until the matter is settled, seems justified to me. I think the only debate here is whether he was beyond the legal limit, the fact that he drank some and drove are most likely well established. It is hard to argue with the suspension if you ask me." on Thu April 21, 2005 16:04:43


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:



[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.