Two more years is not appropriate. It sends the wrong message to the fans, the media, DW and our recruits. Coaching contracts are more statements to the various basketball constituencies nowadays as opposed to binding agreements, but they are critical to sending the message that Fordham is serious about building and maintaining a successful basketball program in the future. DW should get a 4 year extension with strong incentives for graduation rates, NCAA tournament appearances, etc. -- Fordham Rams Basketball Message Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Mon March 21, 2005 21:47:48
Author: Rambacker
Subject: Two more years is not appropriate. It sends the wrong message to the fans, the media, DW and our recruits. Coaching contracts are more statements to the various basketball constituencies nowadays as opposed to binding agreements, but they are critical to sending the message that Fordham is serious about building and maintaining a successful basketball program in the future. DW should get a 4 year extension with strong incentives for graduation rates, NCAA tournament appearances, etc.
In reply to: Upstate Ram 's message, "If we had a proactive athletic administration at FU we could expect that such discussions have already begun. Sadly, it is the history of our alma mater that a matter like this will be ignored until it is too late and DW has been courted by some other program. Luckily, NC State seems to be putting it all together and saving the job of their coach. I'd sure like to see FU at the very least give DW a two-year extension with a decent raise. If Bob Hill was worth 10 years, why not give DW two more?" on Mon March 21, 2005 17:08:20

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

So long as he's doing the job well, DW should always have 4 years left on his contract, as a sign to potential recruits. I believe that was a customary part of Penders' deals. (NT) -- John, Tue March 22, 2005 09:04:12
- Yes, it is typical to have this as it is difficult to recruit without it. We need to give DW everything he needs to get his players. Plus he deserves it. (NT) -- Rambacker, Tue March 22, 2005 09:23:05
  - Is a contract with four years left on some sort of rolling renewal typical for coaches in general or more for those at bigger programs? What you say makes sense but I am not familiar with how these guys structure their contracts. (NT) -- SIram, Tue March 22, 2005 12:41:30
    - Smart AD's structure a coach's contract with automatic rollovers every 2-3 years and have clauses built in for a salary/bonus review periodically so no one can use contract issues against the coach in the recruiting wars. It's more about having a smart AD that uses best practices than just the bigger programs doing this. (NT) -- Rambacker, Tue March 22, 2005 16:20:55

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.