I agree with you on this. It seems the A-10 OCC scheduling guidelines were created before the RPI system was revised and is behind the curve. It should be adapted to the present-day reality and DW seems to be on top of that. -- Fordham Rams Basketball Message Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, [9] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Mon March 14, 2005 12:20:36
Author: Rambacker
Subject: I agree with you on this. It seems the A-10 OCC scheduling guidelines were created before the RPI system was revised and is behind the curve. It should be adapted to the present-day reality and DW seems to be on top of that.
In reply to: J�Dete93 's message, "And it once again proves that SOS is only important in how it affects the RPI, it gives zero benefit to the team that schedules hard. That is why DW is saying that our conference needs to schedule more winnable games. I think our goal should be to have the 5 or 6th toughest out of conference SOS, not the 1st b/c it is not enough of a benefit to have the toughest SOS. Two more wins for each team would go a very long way." on Mon March 14, 2005 09:29:09

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

The key to me is that the guideline should be on a sliding scale based on a team's ability. For instance, this year with only a very slim chance of post-season we should have scheduled a bit easier. The conference would have benefitted more from us going 6-5 OOC with a weaker SOS than they did with us going 4-7 with a SOS of about 60. (NT) -- J�Dete93, Mon March 14, 2005 13:49:20
- Let me finish that thought as I hit the send button too quickly. At the same time a school like GW needed to schedule a bit harder than us b/c they stood to benefit from it by season's end. Each team should schedule based on their perceived ability, not based on some flat guideline. (NT) -- J�Dete93, Mon March 14, 2005 13:51:58
  - That makes sense. Has the A-10 had hard and fast OOC scheduling guidelines? (NT) -- Rambacker, Mon March 14, 2005 14:52:47
    - From what I have been told they have a rule that is fairly strict and if you fail to reach their guideline you are subject to fines. I do not have the details, but each opponent gets assigned a point value based on the RPI range they fall into and if your opponents total more than a certain number then you have failed to schedule as the A-10 wants you to. I am not saying that this was his brainchild, but this sounds very John Chaney-esque to me. (NT) -- J�Dete93, Mon March 14, 2005 16:07:31

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.