Don't throw a hissy fit, Sparky, just check out the 2004-2005 stats, and give us an answer the following: Why do YOU think DW gave "Big Mike" so much playin' time in such an important game, at the expense of guys (Moosh and The Sea Bass) who were more effective producers durin' the season ? I didn't make up those numbers for "Big Mike". They were right there in the box score for everyone to see. Sure, I agree that MB has potential, but how about exploring that potential in a less important game ? Clue me in on what I'm missin' here, instead of rantin' and ravin'. Let's see you realize YOUR potential. -- Fordham Rams Basketball Message Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, [9] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Sat March 12, 2005 01:37:43
Author: Bronx Boy
Subject: Don't throw a hissy fit, Sparky, just check out the 2004-2005 stats, and give us an answer the following: Why do YOU think DW gave "Big Mike" so much playin' time in such an important game, at the expense of guys (Moosh and The Sea Bass) who were more effective producers durin' the season ? I didn't make up those numbers for "Big Mike". They were right there in the box score for everyone to see. Sure, I agree that MB has potential, but how about exploring that potential in a less important game ? Clue me in on what I'm missin' here, instead of rantin' and ravin'. Let's see you realize YOUR potential.
In reply to: Rambacker 's message, "You're a total idiot. And have no clue about where our team is going, Binns potential or basketball in general Find another board to troll. You are boring." on Fri March 11, 2005 21:14:28

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

There's a simple reason Binns played: he matches up better strength-wise and speed-wise with GW's athletes, who run the floor as well as any team in the country and hit the boards with a vengeance . A very good reason to play Binns. Our options are still limited. (NT) -- Rambacker, Sat March 12, 2005 09:47:30
- "Big Mike" is strong and fast, but he reacts to, rather than anticipates, the play on the floor. I don't know if this is due to inexperience or lack of game smarts. The bottom line is: we need some intelligent beef under the boards, if the 2005-2006 team is to have a successful season. (NT) -- Bronx Boy, Sun March 13, 2005 03:32:54
  - I think Binns will continue to progress and will ultimately be a contributor on the floor. He's got some tools to work with. (NT) -- Rambacker, Sun March 13, 2005 11:39:43

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.