VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4] ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 17:31:27 10/03/03 Fri
Author: kbharbert
Subject: Re: DEMODEX: FOR THE RECORD!!
In reply to: Ed Davis 's message, "DEMODEX: FOR THE RECORD!!" on 15:19:51 10/03/03 Fri

ooookkkaaayyyy.....i looked it up myself and see that what your saying is correct.
my question then is for jb-----
obviously you have been in this business for a very long time. you've stated your opinion of which theory should be backed.
does this newer take on the problem make you rethink your original opinion?
if not, why?
and...if i ask nicely, could you use the same everyday language you used in your earlier post today? it's so much easier to understand and i really did appreciate it.
:o)

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:



[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.