Judicial lunacy -- Dearborn County Public Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ]

Subject: Judicial lunacy

Author:
Dan Brewington (Disturbed)

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 21:28:29 05/03/14 Sat

It's quite frightening what lengths the Indiana Courts will go to in order to protect their own judges. Hell they even threw Negangard under the bus in order to dismiss my ineffective counsel claim. Here is the beginning of an analysis of the Supreme Court's decision. In just two sentences, Justice Rush included partial quotes of mine to help demonstrate that I was obsessive and dangerous to Dr. Connor. The problem is she failed to mention the context of the quotes and the fact the quotes were taken from three blogs that were written over the course of a one year time frame. She bunched together my broken quotes about Dr. Connor to support upholding my conviction of Attempted Obstruction of Justice. Oh yeah, I forgot to mention the quotes came anywhere from 6 months to nearly a year and a half AFTER Dr. Connor testified in my divorce. The Indiana Supreme Court used my statements retroactively to support an alleged crime that occurred up to 1.5 years prior to when the statements were actually made. To put it simply, the Indiana Supreme Court upheld my conviction of attempted obstruction of justice of my divorce proceeding for my actions occurring after my divorce proceeding. Check it out. www.danbrewington.blogspot.com

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Re: Judicial lunacy	I agree	09:03:49 05/04/14 Sun

Re: Judicial lunacy	Coalition-Satisfied (best legal minds on free speech.)	14:50:13 05/04/14 Sun
Re: Judicial lunacy -- That's Not The Frightening Part, 07:03:11 05/05/14 Mon