Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ]

Subject: Re: To Wait Author: Anon. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 17:28:05 01/10/13 Thu In reply to: Matt Brewington 's message, "To Wait" on 14:57:56 01/08/13 Tue The real point I made above Matt, is that in the real world, I just can't imagine stretching the law so far that they make their own standards and definitions re: intimidation. The standards used for blogging, picketing, insulting and bitching would place most of these same people in jail for ranting about Obama. Their standards are like no man has seen before. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]