VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234567[8] ]
Subject: Re: Bail Hearing


Author:
JTM
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 19:04:47 08/23/11 Tue
In reply to: Sue Brewington 's message, "Re: Bail Hearing" on 12:21:06 08/22/11 Mon

McHenry and Negangard should know the rules of evidence!! Hearsay without any substantiating evidence is nothing!! Why should they even mention such nonsense, other than to try to bolster their outrageous actions. Hamilton County and the ATF did not take it seriously, why should Dearborn County?

Now that Dan has filed suit in a real Court, is Negangard going to appropriate some more County grant money for his defense???

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.