Re: Bail Hearing -- Dearborn County Public Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, [8] ]

Subject: Re: Bail Hearing

Author:
Sue Brewington

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 12:21:06 08/22/11 Mon
In reply to: thankyou 's message, "Re: Bail Hearing" on 12:19:08 08/20/11 Sat

What did they have? 8 22 11
One interviewed witness . A criminal with a long record, who has been an informant for the Cincinnati Police. Det. McHenry testified that he did not know what Keith Jones got in return. There were no witnesses to this alleged conversation. A tip from Crimestopper�s that is anonymous. Cincinnati Police didn�t pursue an indictment when the conversation happened in Ohio and the ATF agent who was involved also did not seek an indictment. There was no attempt to interview Dan on Thursday, March 10, 2011 while he was still in Ohio. No effort by the Dearborn County Sheriff to interrogate Dan even though he was in their custody the day of the setup of the security detail for Judge Humphrey, Friday, March 11, 2011. I guess the strategy was to use Judge H as bait to catch the guys? McHenry testified that Dan�s phone conversations were monitored and there was no talk of a hit. 2 phone numbers provided by Keith Jones that went nowhere. Where is the indictment? There isn�t one. They just pull their usual stuff and mold a story to fit the circumstances trying to imply, among other things, that this is why Judge Sally Blankenship set such a high bond. She listed her reasons for why she set the high bond. Read the order. Prosecutor N. wants to leave this message; Dan is dangerous because they say so and he should not have reduced bail. Did Dan talk to Keith Jones in the Hamilton County Justice Center? He very well could have. He talks to everyone no matter age, race, etc. He could also have been talking to someone nearby Keith Jones, using sarcasm, and this guy saw an opportunity for himself and ran with it.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Re: Bail Hearing	JTM	19:04:47 08/23/11 Tue