Re: Tommy Bond Misidentification in SPANKY (1932) -- Another Nice Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: Re: Tommy Bond Misidentification in SPANKY (1932)

Author:
JARVIS---Chicago (NOT SO FAST LORDHEATH)
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: Thu, March 09 2023, 4:08:22
In reply to: Matthew 's message, "Re: Tommy Bond Misidentification in SPANKY (1932)" on Thu, March 09 2023, 2:04:13

If I were LordHeath, I wouldn't be so quick to trust the memory of a 5 yr old 30 years after the fact. I agree with TONY & MATTHEW.
I can't count the number of times I've seen birth, death and
other "facts" which were "honestly" reported by subjects and have gone back to the original documentation and found the subject "innocently" reported "facts" they believed true from
personal memories. If MATTHEW and DEMOSS show there was no record of him working at ROACH, that's what I find most acceptable.

I plan to take a look, and if I can show that TOMMY was visiting friends in China, when "Spanky" was filming, maybe LordHeath will be convinced that "you can't be in 2 places at once". (LOL)

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date

Re: Tommy Bond Misidentification in SPANKY (1932) Matthew Thu, March 09 2023, 4:33:29

Re: Side by Side Comparison -- Matthew, Thu, March 09 2023, 5:03:37

Re: Side by Side Comparison -- Lord, Thu, March 09 2023, 11:05:21

[ Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>If I were LordHeath, I wouldn't be so quick to trust >the memory of a 5 yr old 30 years after the fact. I >agree with TONY & MATTHEW. >I can't count the number of times I've seen birth, >death and >other "facts" which were "honestly" reported by >subjects and have gone back to the original >documentation and found the subject "innocently" >reported "facts" they believed true from >personal memories. If MATTHEW and DEMOSS show there >was no record of him working at ROACH, that's what I >find most acceptable. > >I plan to take a look, and if I can show that TOMMY >was visiting friends in China, when "Spanky" was >filming, maybe LordHeath will be convinced that "you >can't be in 2 places at once". (LOL)
Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.