Fordham players aren't "non-scholarship," since they receive generous aid that is only available to football players. In I-AA, only a handful of schools spend more on football scholarships than Fordham. Of course, the last time Army football played a PL representative was 2002, and they lost to lowly Holy Cross. I assume the injury remark was sarcasm. -- FORDHAM RAMS FOOTBALL FORUM

>

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, [8], 9, 10 ]

Subject: Fordham players aren't "non-scholarship," since they receive generous aid that is only available to football players. In I-AA, only a handful of schools spend more on football scholarships than Fordham. Of course, the last time Army football played a PL representative was 2002, and they lost to lowly Holy Cross. I assume the injury remark was sarcasm.

Author:
$3,255,639 FY 04 football expenditures
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 01:11:18 12/09/04 Thu
In reply to: Rambacker 's message, "Playing Army with non-scholarship players would subject them to injury. Very bad dea." on 23:23:39 12/08/04 Wed

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date

Fordham should not play any 1-A football games unless we go full scholarship. Not a good idea for injury reasons. (NT) Rambacker 09:05:50 12/09/04 Thu

Now you're just repeating yourself (NT) -- $$$, 19:08:42 12/09/04 Thu

No, I'm restating the obvious for those posters above who don't get it. (NT) -- Rambacker, 20:53:55 12/09/04 Thu

Not obvious...in fact completely off base and unsupported by any facts. (NT) -- $$$, 22:26:03 12/09/04 Thu

The facts support the statement unequivically. Find another hobby besides trolling on another school's message board. (NT) -- Rambacker, 23:13:10 12/09/04 Thu

Who are you calling a troll? Scanning this board, I don't see a single post from you where you aren't whining about who Fordham's playing or how awful the facilities are. You will not be taken seriously by anyone in authority at Fordham. Stick to subjects you know something about. (NT) -- $$$, 13:59:07 12/10/04 Fri

He would have nothing to write about then. (NT) -- #44, 15:04:49 12/10/04 Fri
Go troll on another school's board and stop being so threatened by my posts. (NT) -- Rambacker, 12:19:22 12/11/04 Sat

Creativity not one of your strong points, eh? (NT) -- $$$, 13:48:16 12/11/04 Sat

Why so obsessed with my posts? Are they hitting a nerve? (NT) -- Rambacker, 21:06:45 12/11/04 Sat