You know it is quite humorous if you think about it. In an effort to skirt a gender equality measure, we are also diminishing opportunities for males from affluent families. We should get special Title IX credit for that one b/c although we are not helping women, we are taking opportunities away from some men and therefore evening the field in a backwards sort of way. -- FORDHAM RAMS FOOTBALL FORUM

>

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, [9], 10 ]

Subject: You know it is quite humorous if you think about it. In an effort to skirt a gender equality measure, we are also diminishing opportunities for males from affluent families. We should get special Title IX credit for that one b/c although we are not helping women, we are taking opportunities away from some men and therefore evening the field in a backwards sort of way.

Author:
J�Dete93
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 09:31:00 12/01/04 Wed
In reply to: JoltinJoe 's message, "Not only that, I get the feeling that the PL's rule against athletic scholarships for football is a Title IX dodge, at least for at least some of the member schools. By running football aid through the financial aid department, you can pass the Title IX implications of that aid off through the student body as a whole, without concentrating the impact in the athletic department. The PL allows scholarships in other sports. Why not football?" on 21:41:55 11/30/04 Tue

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date

JoDete, are you sure you are not a lawyer? (NT) JoltinJoe 14:53:45 12/01/04 Wed

No I am not, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night. (NT) -- J�Dete93, 15:51:13 12/01/04 Wed

That's a bit of a stretch, no? We're hardly denying them the opportunity to come to Fordham. We're denying them a free education, possibly. If you were expanding that argument, you are saying that all football playing schools that don't offer scholarships are denying students from high income families the opportunity to play. I have a feeling Penn and Harvard would argue that. (NT) An Old Coach 09:21:22 12/02/04 Thu

Hey coach, it was said in jest. (NT) -- J�Dete93, 11:26:15 12/02/04 Thu

You mean you really didn't stay at a Holiday Inn Express? (NT) -- An Old Coach, 18:20:28 12/02/04 Thu

Bottom Line is Fordham should move to scholarship football.. FU spends similar to A-10 schools (when you apply fin. aid)... so why not field a better team , receive better exposure and get a chance to play a 1A each year... Fin. Aid packages makes it more diff. to recruit than straight scholly's.. FU can keep good company by playing some good academic schools OCC and play a 1A each year.. Lets get this done.. A-10 now.. (NT) -- JH89, 11:27:46 12/02/04 Thu