>
VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345678[9]10 ]
Subject: Not only that, I get the feeling that the PL's rule against athletic scholarships for football is a Title IX dodge, at least for at least some of the member schools. By running football aid through the financial aid department, you can pass the Title IX implications of that aid off through the student body as a whole, without concentrating the impact in the athletic department. The PL allows scholarships in other sports. Why not football?


Author:
JoltinJoe
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 21:41:55 11/30/04 Tue
In reply to: KL 's message, "full ride vs need based aid. If a student athlete had to choose between Villanova, Richmond, W and M and FU... they would rarely go to Fordham... sure FU is a good school and are other factors. Realistically if your child had a full scholly offer to one of these schools or had to pay 10K..15K..25K.. or whatever at FU.. as a parent or a student athlete even consider FU..probably not.. A-10 now.. enough of this need based Aid crap.. It is reverse discrimination as well..know a few parents who let their kids go elsewhere (to good schools) on full athletic ride rather than pay FU.." on 21:08:08 11/30/04 Tue


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
You know it is quite humorous if you think about it. In an effort to skirt a gender equality measure, we are also diminishing opportunities for males from affluent families. We should get special Title IX credit for that one b/c although we are not helping women, we are taking opportunities away from some men and therefore evening the field in a backwards sort of way. (NT)JóDete9309:31:00 12/01/04 Wed


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.