Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, [10] ]

Subject: I am not going to give away my identity, but I have said who the winner was going to be WELL before each pageant since 2005. I know from experience and the others I just knew from educated observations on BOC's prepping. Even so much as looking at the girl's sponsors is a dead giveaway.. And the judging panel is a dead giveaway as well, how many pageants do you keep seeing the SAME judges over and over? Come on Denis, get a little more discreet.. I just feel bad for all the girls who actually thought they had a chance to win, I knew I never did so I was not hurt nor surprised. Author: Insider [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 14:37:20 04/29/08 Tue In reply to: Insider- It's all about $$ 's message, "Brent, although most knew Natalie was strong, Gretal had a warmth about her that I believe *real* judges would have chosen. Although Natalie would do better on an internationally level, Gretal would have made a genuine better MUC. But we are all forgetting what the pageant is about, looks... who cares if the woman is sweet and kind on the inside.. obviously BOC doesn't, they want a winner who is marketable and $$$. Alice was handpicked too.. she had a ton of modeling potential.. I personally don't think she was that outstanding, most can't see beyond her fashion model potential, there really isn't much else there. Inga no idea, I think she resembled Natalie so they were banking on that fact.. and Samantha she is $$... Maybe they are prepping her for the Adult Film industry.. cause that's the look she has." on 14:31:24 04/29/08 Tue [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date Re: I am not going to give away my identity, but I have said who the winner was going to be WELL before each pageant since 2005. I know from experience and the others I just knew from educated observations on BOC's prepping. Even so much as looking at the girl's sponsors is a dead giveaway.. And the judging panel is a dead giveaway as well, how many pageants do you keep seeing the SAME judges over and over? Come on Denis, get a little more discreet.. I just feel bad for all the girls who actually thought they had a chance to win, I knew I never did so I was not hurt nor surprised. CF 07:44:11 04/30/08 Wed Well the apartment is no issue because BOC hasn't spent the money on one since 2004!!!!! Vanessa was the only one that stayed in it because she was from out of town. That is another reason they like Toronto girls winning, cheaper for them! They can groom their winning well before MUC, once she wins she's practically ready for MU.. so they just do final touchups and hope they are on their way to a Miss Universe. Vanessa was too much work, but really look at Inga, they bombed that one and she was from Toronto. (NT) -- Insider, 11:11:17 04/30/08 Wed