VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345[6]78910 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Wed, Oct 05 2022, 23:34:18"
Author: DM
Subject: If they knew he was being investigated, and still permitted him to judge when judges under investigation aren't permitted to adjudicate, then are any of his results even valid?
In reply to: There may be an explanation... but the current silence won't cut it. 's message, "AIDA needs to publish a statement including a timeline of who knew what, when as well as outlining it's reasons for feeling it was appropriate to keep D.S as a judge. It's the least they can do for us as parents and wider community if we are to retain our confidence in them." on Wed, Oct 05 2022, 23:18:26"


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:




Forum timezone: GMT+10
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.