| Subject: Re: Turbolaser vs. Phaser |
Author:
trekie
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 04:15:56 09/10/02 Tue
Author Host/IP: NoHost/65.163.170.168
In reply to:
capn hayes
's message, "Re: Turbolaser vs. Phaser" on 03:53:38 09/10/02 Tue
>>>>>In ALL canon sources we see, SEE!, the turbolaser
>>>>>pulse, which is impossible to see in a vacuum if it
>>>is
>>>>>a laser. The bolt, which we can see, travels
>>slowwer
>>>>>than the speed of light. And it can and has caused
>>>>>objects to explode before the visible portion
>>arrives
>>>>>at its target.
>>>>>
>>>>>Lasers do none of these things. Therefor they are
>>>not
>>>>>lasers, they do not deal their damage through the
>>>>>effects of photons heating and expanding
>molocules.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Now stop this asinine bull about turbolasers being
>>>>>simple photon projection weapons, because they
>>>>>obviously aren't!
>>>>
>>>>have you ever heard of Laser Eye-Correction Surgery
>>>>what do you think the laser does, it heats the
>>>>molecular structer of your retena so the lens can be
>>>>repaired without pulling out the butcher knives.
>>>>Also, you ever heard of not shining a laser into
>your
>>>>eyes because it may cause you to go blind? Think
>>>>about that. Lasers can be used as weapons, not very
>>>>effective ones if you can just hold up a mirror and
>>>>deflect it way from you. And if you come back to me
>>>>again and say they are not lasers, I will ask you
>>>>"WHY???!???!!!!? are they called LASERS" if they
>>ain't
>>>>lasers?? I am a little confused here.
>>>
>>>Reread the above stuff, the stuff behind ">>"
>>>There is the evedince, compeling and sensible
>evidence
>>>that says, without doubt, that they are not lasers!
>>>You can't see lasers in the vacuum of space! Lasers
>>>travel at the speed of light, TL bolts don't! Before
>>>the visible tracer hits the target it explodes, why?,
>>>because it could be plasme that is so hot the heat
>>>before the head of bolt is so extreme it causes the
>>>instant vaporization of a nickle iron asteroid, We
>>>have canon evidence of that, ESB, so don't even try
>to
>>>argue with it.
>>>
>>>Blasters, lasers cannons, and Turbolasers, are not
>>>true L.A.S.A.R.s, they operate differently, THEY
>DON'T
>>>SHOOT LIGHT!, the discharge of visible light is
>>>secondary and proof that they aren't true L.A.S.A.R.s
>>>
>>>It is a term that doesn't explain the operating
>>>principle, just like the photon torpedo, the name
>>>dosn't say it.
>>
>>HAHAHA! you can't even spell. LASAR?? try LASER.
>>laser is how it is spelled in the closed captions of
>>SW ANH try something else.
>Were not to judge someone's spelling or grammer! Only
>a trekling would be so picky. All you Trekies remind
>me of those nerdy kids on "Galaxy Quest"! "Theres a
>couple of red thingies coming toward the blue flashy
>thingy! I think we're the blue thingy!" BOOM
and your profiling by using the word Trekling.. so you are as derogatory as TrekGOD is.
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
| |
Feedback: 
