| Subject: Re: Turbolaser vs. Phaser |
Author:
capn hayes
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 03:53:38 09/10/02 Tue
Author Host/IP: NoHost/207.14.48.2
In reply to:
TrekGOD
's message, "Re: Turbolaser vs. Phaser" on 17:02:40 09/09/02 Mon
>>>>In ALL canon sources we see, SEE!, the turbolaser
>>>>pulse, which is impossible to see in a vacuum if it
>>is
>>>>a laser. The bolt, which we can see, travels
>slowwer
>>>>than the speed of light. And it can and has caused
>>>>objects to explode before the visible portion
>arrives
>>>>at its target.
>>>>
>>>>Lasers do none of these things. Therefor they are
>>not
>>>>lasers, they do not deal their damage through the
>>>>effects of photons heating and expanding molocules.
>>>>
>>>
>>>>Now stop this asinine bull about turbolasers being
>>>>simple photon projection weapons, because they
>>>>obviously aren't!
>>>
>>>have you ever heard of Laser Eye-Correction Surgery
>>>what do you think the laser does, it heats the
>>>molecular structer of your retena so the lens can be
>>>repaired without pulling out the butcher knives.
>>>Also, you ever heard of not shining a laser into your
>>>eyes because it may cause you to go blind? Think
>>>about that. Lasers can be used as weapons, not very
>>>effective ones if you can just hold up a mirror and
>>>deflect it way from you. And if you come back to me
>>>again and say they are not lasers, I will ask you
>>>"WHY???!???!!!!? are they called LASERS" if they
>ain't
>>>lasers?? I am a little confused here.
>>
>>Reread the above stuff, the stuff behind ">>"
>>There is the evedince, compeling and sensible evidence
>>that says, without doubt, that they are not lasers!
>>You can't see lasers in the vacuum of space! Lasers
>>travel at the speed of light, TL bolts don't! Before
>>the visible tracer hits the target it explodes, why?,
>>because it could be plasme that is so hot the heat
>>before the head of bolt is so extreme it causes the
>>instant vaporization of a nickle iron asteroid, We
>>have canon evidence of that, ESB, so don't even try to
>>argue with it.
>>
>>Blasters, lasers cannons, and Turbolasers, are not
>>true L.A.S.A.R.s, they operate differently, THEY DON'T
>>SHOOT LIGHT!, the discharge of visible light is
>>secondary and proof that they aren't true L.A.S.A.R.s
>>
>>It is a term that doesn't explain the operating
>>principle, just like the photon torpedo, the name
>>dosn't say it.
>
>HAHAHA! you can't even spell. LASAR?? try LASER.
>laser is how it is spelled in the closed captions of
>SW ANH try something else.
Were not to judge someone's spelling or grammer! Only a trekling would be so picky. All you Trekies remind me of those nerdy kids on "Galaxy Quest"! "Theres a couple of red thingies coming toward the blue flashy thingy! I think we're the blue thingy!" BOOM
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
| |
Feedback: 
