| Subject: Re: The Mother of All Proposals |
Author:
Paul
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 13:25:56 05/19/03 Mon
In reply to:
Ali
's message, "The Mother of All Proposals" on 12:47:44 05/19/03 Mon
>Here is the first draft of the full consititutional
>amendment covering the proposed team match format.
And here are some nit-picky comments:
>I've put a few comments in where
>appropriate, describing the reasoning behind a clause
>etc.
Unfortunately, these comments didn't make it through - in this board, anything in angle brackets is considered to be an html tag...
>I will include this, suitably amended, in the big
>proposal document on the web, which I will bring up to
>date so you can all print it out ready for the meeting
>(hint, hint).
Could you remind us of the URL - it's buried in the archives somewhere...
>2.8.1.5
>[...]
>If all four of their teams
>are full then spare beginner couples or individuals
>may also be nominated.
I'm slightly worried about the inflationary effect of this clause. In my view, the "odds and sods" should only include couples from universities that can't fill a complete team.
>2.8.2.1 The Team Events are preceded by a Team
>Walk-On.
"shall be"
>2.8.5.3 After qualifying the divisions are treated as
>separate events and proceed through to finals as
>normal.
"shall be treated..."
>2.8.6.1 Each couple within a team is given the same
>number to wear.
"shall be"
>2.8.6.2 Throughout the match, each team's marks are
>treated together in the same way as couples are in
>open 4-dance events; all members of a team are
>recalled together, and placings are found in finals
>for the whole team. Couples within a team are not
>considered individually.
"shall be"
I prefer the following wording:
2.8.6.2 Throughout the team match, each team shall be treated as if they were a single couple entering a four-dance event, and scrutineered accordingly: all couples are recalled together, and placings found in finals for the whole team. Couples within a team are not considered individually.
>2.10.6 The BDC Skating System is used to evaluate
>marks within each division event.
"shall be"
><whether we want it or not, we've no choice!>
Officially, we're not affiliated with BDC, so can use whatever system we like ;-) However, I agree that the scrutineer will only be familiar with the skating system, so that's the only viable scoring system...
Paul
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
| |
Feedback: 
