VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

a, April 26 2024 [ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Sunday, November 21, 02:28:42pm
Author: El Duque
Subject: I'm not sure what your point is about checks and balances. There is, or should be, fact checking. Is that what you mean? I didn't question the accuracy or inaccuracy of anything in the story; I'm saying that there was information out there, readily available to the reporter (because he took other information from it as well), and they were not included in the article.
In reply to: Dukes81 's message, "I am a big fan of the PG especially their reporters. Im not a reporter but is there not checks & balances in drafting a story? Both sides? Investigate allegations? What do you think El Duque?" on Sunday, November 21, 08:25:48am


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.