Re: Negangard's damning evidence against Brewington -- Dearborn County Public Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ]

Subject: Re: Negangard's damning evidence against Brewington

Author:
Really?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:48:45 01/31/14 Fri
In reply to: Sick of it 's message, "Re: Negangard's damning evidence against Brewington" on 07:03:46 01/30/14 Thu

OK, I'll bite� Why couldn't Brewington see his kids? Are you suggesting that a father with no criminal history, no allegations of abuse or neglect, drugs or alcohol, should lose all rights to his children because of what you call "weird rants" on the internet? Would you like to give an example of a "weird rant" that should remove a father from two small children who love their dad dearly? Brewington was criticizing his government through the lens of a broken family court system. (a system heavily criticized in the recent documentary film "Divorce Corp.") People who believe that not sucking up to an evil and vindictive family court judge like James D. Humphrey should justify removal of a father from two small children need to go back to the King's Monarchy, or take their seat on the back of the bus and be quiet while others keep them free.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Re: Negangard's damning evidence against Brewington	Again? (To Really)	01:28:07 02/01/14 Sat
Re: Negangard's damning evidence against Brewington -- Really?, 08:15:36 02/01/14 Sat