Re: Exorbitant Bond -- Dearborn County Public Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8 ]

Subject: Re: Exorbitant Bond

Author:
Concerned

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 21:34:13 10/06/12 Sat
In reply to: cbmueller- facts verified 's message, "Re: Exorbitant Bond" on 11:11:49 09/20/12 Thu

Any logical person with even a remote sense of morality, would say that it is generally wrong for a seasoned, sitting Judge to be a spin doctor, in an attempt to make her opponent look bad, and when the facts are checked she turned out to be just that, a spin doctor. Shouldn't a judge be concerned with facts and not "hearsay"? Come on let's have a little intellectual honest here. Can you logically defend her comments about the loan??????

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Re: Exorbitant Bond	get over it	07:27:22 10/07/12 Sun
Re: Exorbitant Bond -- concerned by lack of logic, 10:09:24 10/07/12 Sun Re: Exorbitant Bond -- quess what?, 11:38:30 10/07/12 Sun Re: Exorbitant Bond -- Einstein, 14:25:30 10/07/12 Sun