Storm, that was done when Irish Dancing was a cultural activity and a hobby for the dancer, and the teacher DIDN't extract as must dosh as is possible out of teaching. What you are referring to is when Irish Dancing became a commercial enterprise, and the kids have no time for anything else. I suppose you are indeed missing the fleeting show on pants (knicker if you don't understand), and the 59 rocks in the set dance or jig/hornpipe to avoid having to do the one thing you're suppsed to in a heavy dance, i.e. treble (as with some of the present day multiple champions)? Do you know what? Progress isn't always progress, is it? -- For the love of the dance

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Sun, May 12 2024, 18:31:14 [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, [10] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Sat, Feb 10 2007, 19:47:31
Author: In it too long - meant to say didn't extract as much dosh
Subject: Storm, that was done when Irish Dancing was a cultural activity and a hobby for the dancer, and the teacher DIDN't extract as must dosh as is possible out of teaching. What you are referring to is when Irish Dancing became a commercial enterprise, and the kids have no time for anything else. I suppose you are indeed missing the fleeting show on pants (knicker if you don't understand), and the 59 rocks in the set dance or jig/hornpipe to avoid having to do the one thing you're suppsed to in a heavy dance, i.e. treble (as with some of the present day multiple champions)? Do you know what? Progress isn't always progress, is it?
In reply to: USmom 's message, "Nice diversion from recent posts" on Wed, Feb 07 2007, 12:40:50

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> I am very much aware of the 'cultural activity' that it used to be, I could have been looking at myself in my younger day on that link (more inside) -- storm, Sun, Feb 11 2007, 1:01:30 [1]

I agree with some of your comments in that some dancers cannot treble for toffee & get away with it & that some of the traditional aspects of steps are being replaced by non-traditional steps which is a shame (when was the last time you saw a cross-key?) & it saddens me that some children are penalised because they do not have/cannot afford the 'look'. But the majority of top dancers (even as young as 8) perform the most intricate & complex stepswith great trebles & with masses of stamina & effort & I admire the practise that they must put into it. My kids will never be at that standard because for them it will always be a cultural activity but it doesn't stop me looking at the top dancers in awe because of their ability which quite frankly is in another league to when I danced and to that link and that to me is great progress. The link was a great trip down memory lane but I don't think the majority of people are going to look at it and think 'if only they danced like that now!' Personally I am thinking I wish THEY DID dance like that now because my dd would probably be on her way to the worlds in April at that standard!

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> Tend to agree with you storm. Your post (inside) gave me a chuckle. Thanks -- mum, Sun, Feb 18 2007, 22:43:16 [1]

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]