This is a very good point. I know several Fordham administrators at high levels that read this board with interest. Such a change in policy would eliminate the opportunity for these people to implement change at FU based on creative ideas posted here. It would also preclude current Board members from posting. This is a huge negative factor for making such a change. -- FORDHAM RAMS FOOTBALL FORUM

>

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: This is a very good point. I know several Fordham administrators at high levels that read this board with interest. Such a change in policy would eliminate the opportunity for these people to implement change at FU based on creative ideas posted here. It would also preclude current Board members from posting. This is a huge negative factor for making such a change.

Author:
Rambacker
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 11:24:57 04/06/05 Wed
In reply to: anonymous 's message, "As an administrator who reads the board, and looks to implement good ideas when I hear them, I could not access a board that required actual identification. I fear a valuable means of feedback would be lost." on 11:00:10 04/06/05 Wed

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date

Anonymity would be maintained. (See inside) Rob Smith 14:38:16 04/06/05 Wed

The additional features would be to numerous to list here. (NT) -- Rob Smith, 14:48:03 04/06/05 Wed
But the e-mail address connected to the username eliminates anonymity, correct? That remains a problem. I think the current board is fine. What has prompted you to change? (NT) -- Rambacker, 15:49:28 04/06/05 Wed

The email connected to the user name is not seen by anyone. It is just there to prevent someone from registering multiple names and to prevent them from replying to their own threads as someone else. My desire to make change stems from having to check in on this board every 30 minutes or so to delete posts that are offensive and do not belong. (NT) -- Rob Smith, 17:33:17 04/06/05 Wed

Wow, that's a lot of checking in to prevent problems. Kudos to you for the commitment to making this board work. You do a nice job. I must say though that I'm not convinced all will believe that their e-mail address won't be revealed if you go to the new process. It's hard to prove and those that are important that come here will probably stop. (NT) -- Rambacker, 18:07:11 04/06/05 Wed

I've only been on the 30 minute check ins lately due to the recent events. Other than that I try to check in daily. (NT) -- Rob Smith, 20:27:55 04/06/05 Wed

Again, I think the e-mail requirement in the new process will stop many from posting. Particularly those in the administration, Board, etc. I would suggest you keep this format. (NT) -- Rambacker, 22:38:42 04/06/05 Wed