| Subject: Re: Photos of Jimmy and Jimena |
Author:
RockGroupieCom
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 15:13:22 02/21/05 Mon
In reply to:
Starla
's message, "Re: Photos of Jimmy and Jimena" on 22:52:47 02/20/05 Sun
Thanks for your input and I agree with you. The need for finding the: "youngest, most impressionable
>or vulnerable & groom them for a future
>'relationship'. More often these unions are based on a
>prefered role imbalance so the younger is dependent,
>subjugated or a subordinate in the elder's life." is, I'm sure very obvious to everyone. He is looking for someone he can control, someone who is naive enough to put up with whatever he wants her to put up with. I have a feeling as these young girls get older and develop a mind of their own, he trades them in and rationalizes that they have become too difficult to deal with. It's sad that he can't seem to handle a real woman. When I said his relationship with what is essentially a "little girl" is putting him in a bad light, I was not only referring to the pedophile nature of the situation, but also to the fact that his little girl fetish actually makes him look like a weak man. Primarily because it IS so obvious why a man would choose a girl so young. He's absolutely terrified of dealing with a woman his equal. Taking someone this young is no longer about finding someone for their looks and sex appeal. More psychological issues are at hand here. I want to say, I hear what you are saying and though your reasoning is correct, it is still not an excuse for being a pedophile. Unfortunately when a 55-60 year old man marries a young woman who was obviously WELL underage at the time the relationship was consummated, that is pedophilia.
>As far as resemblence, @ least in one of the photos,
>she looks like she could be related to his first
>long-time early teen love; one he seemed to lose
>interest in & unceremoniously ditch when she
>approached the age of twenty.
>
>As stated before (& I've even known a few), many times
>people will look for the youngest, most impressionable
>or vulnerable & groom them for a future
>'relationship'. More often these unions are based on a
>prefered role imbalance so the younger is dependent,
>subjugated or a subordinate in the elder's life.
>
>More than likely, in exchange for this, he agreed to
>help w/setting up a charitable organization. But this
>could have been done as a pre-emptive strike before
>more people found out about the relationship. He
>hasn't exactly had a reputation for being magnanimous
>before this point.
>
>
>
>>Yes, he seems to like dark hair and eyes. Yes she
>>looks sweet....because she's so young. However,
>>charitable or no charitable givings, it is a slippery
>>and dangerous slope to condone a man his age getting
>>involved with someone THAT young. It simply isn't
>>right. This doesn't put him in a good light at all.
>>Who will be the naysayer to him? I will. It's wrong,
>>plain and simple. He's a pedophile. Simple as
>>that....and it's creepy. But more than that, it's
>>disappointing. Just like with Michael Jackson, it's
>>disappointing that so much twisted behavior can come
>>from such a talented individual. I want to believe MJ
>>is innocent, but the things that are coming out are
>>not good at all. It really sounds like he's going to
>>prison. Detailed testimony is coming from the young
>>boy. There are also reports of MJ sending young boys
>>"love letters" of sorts. I'll hold off making any
>>firm opinion either way but it just doesn't sound like
>>things will go MJ's way.
>>
>>
>>>See any resemblence to any past girlfriends?
>>>
>>>She's so lovely & looks so sweet. I'm sure he's
>taking
>>>care of her & helping out her family - who knows,
>>>maybe they're thrilled. There hasn't been any
>>>confirmation that they're actually married, though.
>>>
>>>Maybe JP views this as a small price to pay for
>making
>>>someone this young his own & that something this
>>>extreme will go down better if a charitable
>>>organization is set up before-hand.
>>>
>>>And who's going to be a naysayer to him? He's
>probably
>>>not used to not getting his way. Something about it
>>>seems forced & creepy, though, way moreso than
>>>w/Nicholson, Jagger, Wyman, Stewart or any others.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>To see photos of the two together go to link:
>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.gibson.com/whatsnew/pressrelease/2002/de
>c
>>1
>>>1b.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Another one of Jimena
>>>>
>>>>http://www.ledzeppelin.ru/pa/pg/jp_aft1.htm
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
| |
Feedback: 