| Subject: Re: Photos of Jimmy and Jimena |
Author:
Starla
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 09:44:25 02/22/05 Tue
In reply to:
RockGroupieCom
's message, "Re: Photos of Jimmy and Jimena" on 15:13:22 02/21/05 Mon
It should be highlighted exactly where JP met this young lady & under what conditions, as well as where any information can be found. He has seemed even more guarded than usual & the only record of the pairing is attached to a charitable campaign. As noted before, she is said to wear a ring, but no one has come up w/any information as to if & when they ever got married. This may be part of a strategy or overall plan, as much as the charitable organization.
And one can also look at where the event was held & who was present. Although some notables were there (mostly guitar merchants & studio engineers) & others who weren't donated items, even more were not present, nor associated in any way. Those who weren't seem to speak volumes.
The point being; despite the general amount of privacy, no one is being very open about this. And those who seem to be complicit are either citizens of S. America in need of help or JP's guitar associates who either 'yes' him or need him for their business.
Again, one has to ask themselves what has been this man's pattern & does it stem from something organically psychological or just adverse learned behavior? And if he has grown a benevolent heart (which, quite frankly, given his gratuitous past seems highly unlikely), why couldn't he have found someone older - at least well into their 20s already - & then set up an organization?
http://www.frankmelfi.com/NycHtml/NYimage15.html
>Thanks for your input and I agree with you. The need for >finding the: "youngest, most impressionable or vulnerable & >>groom them for a future 'relationship'. More often these >>unions are based on a prefered role imbalance so the >>younger is dependent, subjugated or a subordinate in the >>elder's life."
>is, I'm sure very obvious to everyone. He is looking
>for someone he can control, someone who is naive
>enough to put up with whatever he wants her to put up
>with. I have a feeling as these young girls get older
>and develop a mind of their own, he trades them in and
>rationalizes that they have become too difficult to
>deal with. It's sad that he can't seem to handle a
>real woman. When I said his relationship with what is
>essentially a "little girl" is putting him in a bad
>light, I was not only referring to the pedophile
>nature of the situation, but also to the fact that his
>little girl fetish actually makes him look like a weak
>man. Primarily because it IS so obvious why a man
>would choose a girl so young. He's absolutely
>terrified of dealing with a woman his equal. Taking
>someone this young is no longer about finding someone
>for their looks and sex appeal. More psychological
>issues are at hand here. I want to say, I hear what
>you are saying and though your reasoning is correct,
>it is still not an excuse for being a pedophile.
>Unfortunately when a 55-60 year old man marries a young >woman who was obviously WELL underage at the time the >relationship was consummated, that is pedophilia.
>
>
>
>>As far as resemblence, @ least in one of the photos,
>>she looks like she could be related to his first
>>long-time early teen love; one he seemed to lose
>>interest in & unceremoniously ditch when she
>>approached the age of twenty.
>>
>>As stated before (& I've even known a few), many times
>>people will look for the youngest, most impressionable
>>or vulnerable & groom them for a future
>>'relationship'. More often these unions are based on a
>>prefered role imbalance so the younger is dependent,
>>subjugated or a subordinate in the elder's life.
>>
>>More than likely, in exchange for this, he agreed to
>>help w/setting up a charitable organization. But this
>>could have been done as a pre-emptive strike before
>>more people found out about the relationship. He
>>hasn't exactly had a reputation for being magnanimous
>>before this point.
>>
>>
>>
>>>Yes, he seems to like dark hair and eyes. Yes she
>>>looks sweet....because she's so young. However,
>>>charitable or no charitable givings, it is a slippery
>>>and dangerous slope to condone a man his age getting
>>>involved with someone THAT young. It simply isn't
>>>right. This doesn't put him in a good light at all.
>>>Who will be the naysayer to him? I will. It's
>wrong,
>>>plain and simple. He's a pedophile. Simple as
>>>that....and it's creepy. But more than that, it's
>>>disappointing. Just like with Michael Jackson, it's
>>>disappointing that so much twisted behavior can come
>>>from such a talented individual. I want to believe
>MJ
>>>is innocent, but the things that are coming out are
>>>not good at all. It really sounds like he's going to
>>>prison. Detailed testimony is coming from the young
>>>boy. There are also reports of MJ sending young boys
>>>"love letters" of sorts. I'll hold off making any
>>>firm opinion either way but it just doesn't sound
>like
>>>things will go MJ's way.
>>>
>>>
>>>>See any resemblence to any past girlfriends?
>>>>
>>>>She's so lovely & looks so sweet. I'm sure he's
>>taking
>>>>care of her & helping out her family - who knows,
>>>>maybe they're thrilled. There hasn't been any
>>>>confirmation that they're actually married, though.
>>>>
>>>>Maybe JP views this as a small price to pay for
>>making
>>>>someone this young his own & that something this
>>>>extreme will go down better if a charitable
>>>>organization is set up before-hand.
>>>>
>>>>And who's going to be a naysayer to him? He's
>>probably
>>>>not used to not getting his way. Something about it
>>>>seems forced & creepy, though, way moreso than
>>>>w/Nicholson, Jagger, Wyman, Stewart or any others.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>To see photos of the two together go to link:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>http://www.gibson.com/whatsnew/pressrelease/2002/d
>e
>>c
>>>1
>>>>1b.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Another one of Jimena
>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.ledzeppelin.ru/pa/pg/jp_aft1.htm
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
| |
Feedback: 