| Subject: Re: Turbolaser vs. Phaser |
Author:
TrekGOD
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 17:02:40 09/09/02 Mon
Author Host/IP: NoHost/65.163.170.209
In reply to:
The Divine Shadow
's message, "Re: Turbolaser vs. Phaser" on 17:36:02 09/07/02 Sat
>>>In ALL canon sources we see, SEE!, the turbolaser
>>>pulse, which is impossible to see in a vacuum if it
>is
>>>a laser. The bolt, which we can see, travels slowwer
>>>than the speed of light. And it can and has caused
>>>objects to explode before the visible portion arrives
>>>at its target.
>>>
>>>Lasers do none of these things. Therefor they are
>not
>>>lasers, they do not deal their damage through the
>>>effects of photons heating and expanding molocules.
>>>
>>
>>>Now stop this asinine bull about turbolasers being
>>>simple photon projection weapons, because they
>>>obviously aren't!
>>
>>have you ever heard of Laser Eye-Correction Surgery
>>what do you think the laser does, it heats the
>>molecular structer of your retena so the lens can be
>>repaired without pulling out the butcher knives.
>>Also, you ever heard of not shining a laser into your
>>eyes because it may cause you to go blind? Think
>>about that. Lasers can be used as weapons, not very
>>effective ones if you can just hold up a mirror and
>>deflect it way from you. And if you come back to me
>>again and say they are not lasers, I will ask you
>>"WHY???!???!!!!? are they called LASERS" if they ain't
>>lasers?? I am a little confused here.
>
>Reread the above stuff, the stuff behind ">>"
>There is the evedince, compeling and sensible evidence
>that says, without doubt, that they are not lasers!
>You can't see lasers in the vacuum of space! Lasers
>travel at the speed of light, TL bolts don't! Before
>the visible tracer hits the target it explodes, why?,
>because it could be plasme that is so hot the heat
>before the head of bolt is so extreme it causes the
>instant vaporization of a nickle iron asteroid, We
>have canon evidence of that, ESB, so don't even try to
>argue with it.
>
>Blasters, lasers cannons, and Turbolasers, are not
>true L.A.S.A.R.s, they operate differently, THEY DON'T
>SHOOT LIGHT!, the discharge of visible light is
>secondary and proof that they aren't true L.A.S.A.R.s
>
>It is a term that doesn't explain the operating
>principle, just like the photon torpedo, the name
>dosn't say it.
HAHAHA! you can't even spell. LASAR?? try LASER. laser is how it is spelled in the closed captions of SW ANH try something else.
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
| |
Feedback: 
