VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 11:11:25 05/10/12 Thu
Author: chris k
Subject: To cut the writers of Bones a little slack - it didn't help that the lead got pregnant when she did and they couldn't do much while the show was on Hiatus- but a few flashback moments might have been the solution before she blurted out the pregnancy- or maybe the fans can rally and DEMAND flashback scenes to fill in the gaps- LOL - you know like JAG did with 4% solution -
In reply to: JJ (Ronda) 's message, "He must have learned from the mistakes of the Bones people and the backlash from the Bones fans. Inside" on 20:39:34 05/09/12 Wed


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> I know that there was a lot of contraversy about the Paraguay arc, but it did provide Mac with a reason for looking pregnant. I'm sure Bones could have done something, particularly as they use quirky humour in their writing. Lots of shows have had to handle pregnancy. But as you said, to destroy a romantic build up in one or two sentences, was a horrible decision. What about filming hot, romantic scenes anyway, when she was first pregnant, and then fudge the time line? -- Cece, 11:33:14 05/10/12 Thu [1]


[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> Yeah I actually think it's neat that for once, they weren't going to try to gloss over the actress' pregnancy, but rather use it. What I don't like is a) that we never got to see their beginning (yes I feel cheated!), and b) now that they have the baby, they lost all steam! They're sweet but... boring! I still watch, and it's still a good show, but it's ... lacking. -- Colie, 12:59:51 05/10/12 Thu [1]


[ Edit | View ]

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.