Inadequate defense? -- Dearborn County Public Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8 ]

Subject: Inadequate defense?

Author:
Maxine

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 09:46:04 10/15/11 Sat

Look at the bull$%&* that happened in this Brewington case.
The minute the public defender posted no witnesses it was obvious he was ignorant of his opponent's tactics.
Adequate defense should have read the entire file and consulted with the client in advance.
Adequate defense would have taken the "protect the judge" gloves off and exposed the vindictive factors in this case. And allowing the prosecutor to determine the focus of the arguments was negligence.
Let's not forget the sheriff and underlings undermining the client's ability to contribute to his defense by restricting his access to his medications as prescribed by his personal physician. Yeah this is bullsh^%*& IMHO

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Re: Inadequate defense?	Raylan	11:39:24 10/16/11 Sun