Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8 ]

Subject: Re: Inadequate defense? Author: Raylan [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 11:39:24 10/16/11 Sun In reply to: Maxine 's message, "Inadequate defense?" on 09:46:04 10/15/11 Sat And don't forget the trumped up "drive by", no doubt concocted to ensure that he was denied access to outside council (in addition to controlling his meds as you point out). Where was the defense's challenge to this easily debunked lie at the bond hearing (not that it would have helped given that Blankenship appears to have been in on the fix)? [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]