gaming -- Psualum Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: gaming

Author:
vert

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 13:53:27 02/28/13 Thu

I would imagine Har rah's would have a network of players in each state that they a) have a casin0 property and b) on line gam ing is legalized. I would assume they're already pushing those states to consider this legislation to boost their player pool.

I'm pretty sure the way I read the NJ article, each casin0 needs to house servers in their casin0 facility.

For sl ots and ta ble gam es, that's fine but I don't imagine they can support pok er if the network of players is site/state specific.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]