TIM, If You Agree About Garcia... -- 49ers Paradise Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, [10] ]

Subject: TIM, If You Agree About Garcia...

Author:
TANK

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 18:14:01 12/23/02 Mon

TIM: It was nice to see you agree with Ira Miller that Garcia is ONE of the probems with the 49ers' offense. Look a bit more closely at how he explains Steve Young's impatience affecting the offense, and you will see all that you lament about the current offense:

"During his early seasons with the 49ers, Steve Young's natural impatience inhibited the team's offense. He was too quick to run from the pocket, causing the offense to operate in spurts instead of running smoothly, as plays often were not permitted to develop the way they were designed."

Remove Young's name and insert Garcia's.

* "causing the offense to operate in spurts instead of running smoothly,"

* "plays often were not permitted to develop the way they were designed."

So, if Garcia is responsible for this, then what is Mariucci being blaed for? Predictably running on second and long situations? If that is all you got against the man, then you certainly cannot justify running him out of town without a better option in the bag.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]