Author:
TANK
[ Edit | View ]
|
Date Posted: 16:49:09 12/28/02 Sat
TIM argues that "a very good coach would be able to cover over for that failing (Garcia's inadequacy as a deep passer) without taking the guts out of the west coast system." The problem is, he uses Rich Gannon as an example of someone with a questionable arm benefitting from great coaching (Marc Trestman???) to produce the most exciting offense in the league. I would argue that Gannon is benefitting from having two unanimous, Hall of Fame wide receivers (Jerry Rice and Tim Brown), two or three tight ends that would start for the 49ers (Roland Williams, Jeremy Brigham and 2nd round pick Doug Jolley), plus possibly the best (and largest) offensive line in the NFL.
Al Davis is no fool. He invests heavily in his offensive line, which is built around 1st round draft picks, All Pros and even a free agent that Terry Donahue covetted (Frank Middleton). Even Bill Walsh's offenses benefitted from early draft picks, like Keith Fahnhorst (2nd), Harris Barton (1st), Bubba Parris (2nd, 29th overall), Randy Cross (2nd), and Guy McIntyre (3rd).
Bill Walsh also valued tight ends. So he signed Russ Francis AND Charlie Young, drafted Ken McAfee (1st) AND John Frank (2nd) and developed local, small school (SCU) star Brent Jones. Walsh's offenses were always two or three deep at tight end. TIM considers Eric Johnson "very, very good," but could he beat out Francis, Young, Frank or Jones? NO! Johnson would have been a third string TE during the bulk of Walsh's years.
Defenses around the league have spent the better part of 20 years trying to shut down the WCO. The most effective scheme is the two deep zone. This requires a tight end to get deep and split the safeties, who are cheating towards the receivers (i.e., double coverage on Terrell Owens deep). Has Johnson proven effective deep over the middle? NO!
When the offense struggled mid-season, is it any coincidence that Johnson was out with a back injury? To illustrate the drop off at the TE position, just note that Swift was a virtual nothing when Johnson was out. Then, upon his return, Johnson had 16 receptions in two games. That illustrates how important the TE is to the WCO; perhaps the "guts" that TIM refers to in an earlier post.
Note: When Gruden got to Tampa Bay, the first thing he did was sign Ken Dilger and Keenan McCardell to line up opposite Keyshawn Johnson; Shanahan resigned Shanahan Sharpe and drafted Ashley Lelie (1st) to compliment Rod Smith and McCaffrey; Green Bay/Mike Sherman drafted Bubba Franks (1st), drafted Javon Walker (1st) and signed Terry Glenn; Holmgren drafted Jeremy Steven (1st) to compliment Koren Robinson and Darrell Jackson; Belichick drafted Daniel Graham (1st), Deion Branch (2nd) and signed Donald Hayes to compliment Troy Brown and David Patten. Mariucci has a nice 7th round surprise.
Speaking of Shanahan, TIM must wonder, why couldn't a very good coach like Mike Shanahan "be able to cover over for the loss of McCaffrey last year without taking the guts out of the west coast offense?" Or, why couldn't Mike Holmgren be able to cover for the failings of Jon Kitna, Trent Dilfer, Matt Hasselbeck and Ryan Leaf without taking the guts out of the WCO the last four years in Seattle?
It is obvious that quality of personnel plays a huge roll in play calling and execution. Garcia has been misfiring deep all season, but particularly the past month, so maybe Eric Johnson cannot be blamed for not getting deep like Jones. Lets face it, Jones benefitted from Montana and Young. But, it also shows how ridiculous it is to compare this offense with previous incarnations of Bill Walsh's offense. Aside from Terrell Owens, Fred Beasley, Jeremy Newberry and Ron Stone, I don't think the other starters measure up to what Walsh had in his arsenal. Even the Hearst/Barlow attack isn't as explosive as Roger Craig or Wendell Tyler. Hearst is clearly slowing and Barlow is inconsistant (I think Barlow could be a star next year, but then again, I thought he would be a bigger star this year).
TIM says Tai Streets is "very, very good and a great compliment to Terrell Owens." Your standards are frightfully low. I like Streets footwork along the sideline, and he is a nice possession receiver (lots of first downs), but all one has to do is look at his yards after the catch to see that he isn't a "John Taylor-like" threat, nor does he fight for extra yards like Dwight Clark. Defensive coordinators don't lay awake with worry wondering how to account for him, hoping he doesn't break one for a TD. Taylor averaged 16.1 yards per reception for his career - over a five year period (1989-1993) Taylor averaged 7 TD's and 17.1 yards. How many TD's does Streets have to compliment Owens? YPC? YAC? Streets goes down within three yards of every pass he catches (I hope he makes me eat my words over the next three or four weeks).
If you want to "put the Walsh back in the Bill Walsh offense," maybe you should start with a Bill Walsh offensive line, a Bill Walsh quarterback, two Bill Walsh receivers and a Bill Walsh TE who can catch deep. If you don't have these elements, just look to the Bill Walsh offense at Stanford in the early 1990's to see how effective it is with inferior parts.
|