take it easy -- 49ers Paradise Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: take it easy

Author:
fearyaks

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 22:30:08 01/07/03 Tue

JJ take it easy ok? I did not say that Rumph had a perfect day. I said he had a good game. He did not give up a big play. Did not give up 2 TDs (Plummer) or even 1 TD (Parrish). He wasn't caught with his feet planted (like he was against the Eagles and Packers). He held his own out there which is what I ask for a rookie DB.
I watched the game and if you'd like I will bust out the tape and watch it again highlighting Shockey's catches and who they were against. In case you hadn't heard Shockey and Peterson were more often lined up against each other.
Often, I found Mike left in his squat watching his own feet to see if they worked, after Shockey or Toomer ripped by him. since he was 'often found watching his own feet' why don't you tell me a couple of plays in which Toomer ripped by him??? or even Shockey ripping by him while he dawdled like Forest Gump.
why address the corner situation at all Rumph seems to have it nailed down
Err this is not what I am saying at all. In fact I think Rumph is the weak link in our secondary. I would have no problem finding someone else to take his spot. I simply thought that he had a good game against the Giants.
Shockey would've caught Rumph before he got to the 40 yard line if the good Lord would've seen to it he intercepted one. Does it matter if he'd have been caught? I suppose it would have had he been gawking at his feet instead of trying to put the ball in the endzone.
please don't extract one play to represent his overall effectiveness.
Then please give me two plays in which he was left in his squat watching his own feet to see if they worked.

I think you are confusing #24 for #29 as Plummer was the one who was out of place most of the game (though he did have a groin injury).

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]