Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: True. We know exactly who is posting these things because they post the same thing on their Facebook, so they need to stop being cowardous and just sign their name. Either way, had their daughter won, people would be saying it was rigged too because they sure didn't deserve to win Author: No name [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: Monday, July 01, 07:36:54pm In reply to: 's message, "If I was y’all I’d be very embarrassed of how I’m acting because you look like a bunch of butt hurt mamas who are mad their daughter didn’t win. Newsflash: your daughter didn’t do well enough to be top 15/top 10/top 5. Why? She probably had a bad interview. Is it the end of the world? No. Don’t like it? Don’t participate. Either way, find some hobbies or find Jesus because y’all need something." on Monday, July 01, 07:33:37pm [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> Subject: Nope....not even close....guess again. Some of us are just tired of rewarding mediocrity. Why is it wrong to be good in ALL phases? Those girls are out there. We just historically leave them clapping for a subpar winner and then tell them they are sour grapes if they dare to complain. SICK of the status quo. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Monday, July 01, 08:17:09pm

[> [> [> [> Subject: I didn’t see one girl out there that was great in all phases, and I can point out the error with each one of them if you want your daughter’s feelings hurt. There was no perfect person on that stage and overall lack in talent as compared to last year. Two nights of talent were bad, and one night only had like 2-3 decent people. Overall, your daughter wasn’t the best one, and just because she had a talent does not mean she was good in interview or onstage question. Maybe she isn’t as good as you think mom, get over it. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Monday, July 01, 08:24:14pm

[> [> [> [> [> Subject: If you think the only people who watch and care about this program are the mothers of contestants, then you are either stupid or delusional. It was televised on TV!! I truly hope more people than just the moms watch and care. Please see beyond the nose on your face. Please realize that drinking the Kool-Aid is hazardous to your health. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Monday, July 01, 08:42:41pm

[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Trust me when I say the only people in this state who know or care about this pageant are the moms, families of the girls/people they tell about it, and LEDs. And trust me again when I say the general public does not know or care about the voy board and wouldn’t be writing on it. So yeah, we can make a general assumption on you being an uptight family member of one of the TWO girls who have mother’s acting out on Facebook or the one crazy former LED. Let’s be real, you aren’t hiding it well Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Monday, July 01, 08:54:10pm

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Bless your heart....you really are stupid and delusional. If I told you my name you wouldn’t even know me. After watching Saturday’s fiasco, I truly hope as you do that the only people who watched were contestants family members. Because if anyone else watched it, you would lose sponsorship right and left, and this poor new queen will never be asked to do any appearances. Again....bless your heart for your shortsighted, narrow-minded view. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Monday, July 01, 09:02:12pm

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: And yet oddly enough our sponsorships are going up every year and we are still doing better than the national pageant. And if you are so concerned with a pageant you have no involvement in then you really need a life or some hobbies. But go ahead and list your name then ;) Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Monday, July 01, 09:09:40pm >The truth is Morgan probably had very high scores in >interview and on stage question and she was way ahead >of everyone. You can’t be a good Miss SC without >that ! At the end of the day I want the speaker for >the job of Miss SC . Now move on your DD did not win .

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Trust me when I say the only people in this state who know or care about this pageant are the moms, families of the girls/people they tell about it, and LEDs. And trust me again when I say the general public does not know or care about the voy board and wouldn’t be writing on it. So yeah, we can make a general assumption on you being an uptight family member of one of the TWO girls who have mother’s acting out on Facebook or the one crazy former LED. Let’s be real, you aren’t hiding it well Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Monday, July 01, 09:02:57pm The truth is Morgan probably had very high scores in interview and on stage question and she was way ahead of everyone. You can’t be a good Miss SC without that ! At the end of the day I want the speaker for the job of Miss SC . Now move on your DD did not win .

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: One thing remains true, anytime this organization wants to justify not advancing a candidate that's good in onstage performances, the interview card is pulled. "It must be the interview." to try and justify unfairness. Making girls super nervous about it as if they're not capable of answering basic questions for 10 minutes. Get real this the only phase of competition that you can't see but makes it appears that only a select few are intellectual and smart. So no matter how you spin this, you would hide on this board and tear down other girls as well, who are equally intellectual but their talent is better and STILL weighs more based on the MAO but evidently not MSCOO. SO SHAME ON YOU if your on the board/LED that recruit these girls every year to fill your slots or meet your quotas!! Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Monday, July 01, 10:28:34pm >The truth is Morgan probably had very high scores in >interview and on stage question and she was way ahead >of everyone. You can’t be a good Miss SC without >that ! At the end of the day I want the speaker for >the job of Miss SC . Now move on your DD did not win .

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: I love how you act like it doesn’t matter when it’s the longest time they spend with the judges and the only time they truly spend with them. Would it make you feel better if you sat there and watched your daughter suck? Or everyone else did? You’re so full of it. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Monday, July 01, 10:56:18pm >>The truth is Morgan probably had very high scores in >>interview and on stage question and she was way ahead >>of everyone. You can’t be a good Miss SC without >>that ! At the end of the day I want the speaker for >>the job of Miss SC . Now move on your DD did not win .

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: I love how you act like it doesn’t matter when it’s the longest time they spend with the judges and the only time they truly spend with them. Would it make you feel better if you sat there and watched your daughter suck? Or everyone else did? You’re so full of it.-You completely missed the point...oh but wait you can see things through a very tunnel vision. Now it ALL makes sense, some only get what they want to get. So I would not be trying to reason with foolery. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Tuesday, July 02, 12:16:22am >>>The truth is Morgan probably had very high scores in >>>interview and on stage question and she was way ahead >>>of everyone. You can’t be a good Miss SC without >>>that ! At the end of the day I want the speaker for >>>the job of Miss SC . Now move on your DD did not win >.

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: One thing remains true, anytime this organization wants to justify not advancing a candidate that's good in onstage performances, the interview card is pulled. "It must be the interview." to try and justify unfairness. Making girls super nervous about it as if they're not capable of answering basic questions for 10 minutes. Get real this the only phase of competition that you can't see but makes it appears that only a select few are intellectual and smart. So no matter how you spin this, you would hide on this board and tear down other girls as well, who are equally intellectual but their talent is better and STILL weighs more based on the MAO but evidently not MSCOO. SO SHAME ON YOU if your on the board/LED that recruit these girls every year to fill your slots or meet your quotas!! Author: Pageant winner was found in interview and they loved her after that . That’s why she won ! [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Thursday, July 04, 09:23:33pm >>The truth is Morgan probably had very high scores in >>interview and on stage question and she was way ahead >>of everyone. You can’t be a good Miss SC without >>that ! At the end of the day I want the speaker for >>the job of Miss SC . Now move on your DD did not win .

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: One thing remains true, anytime this organization wants to justify not advancing a candidate that's good in onstage performances, the interview card is pulled. "It must be the interview." to try and justify unfairness. Making girls super nervous about it as if they're not capable of answering basic questions for 10 minutes. Get real this the only phase of competition that you can't see but makes it appears that only a select few are intellectual and smart. So no matter how you spin this, you would hide on this board and tear down other girls as well, who are equally intellectual but their talent is better and STILL weighs more based on the MAO but evidently not MSCOO. SO SHAME ON YOU if your on the board/LED that recruit these girls every year to fill your slots or meet your quotas!! Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Tuesday, July 16, 10:59:08pm First, we will never know her scores, or anybody else for that matter so to say she was way ahead of everyone else is simply not true and can't be proven. I saw at least 10 girls just as poised and well spoken on stage. Second, everyone knew during prelims personal interview was 25% & talent was 50%. We can say with confidence that she probably scored well in personal interview and we all know she should have scored one of the worst in talent. I would say bottom third easily. So how she even made top 10 is suspicious at best. Third, once they got her in top 5, it is ballot at that point and not the top overall score. So all they needed to do was figure out how to allocate and pad the scores to get her in top 15, then top 10, & finally in top 5. I ran a few scenarios with scores and none of them had her in top 10 unless you padded her talent scores and gave lower than usual marks to others. So I do not see how you can view this judging other than judges we given a directive by MSCO & they scored it that way. It seems very obvious. I just don't want to believe an organization can be this misleading and dishonest with the scoring. If this is how they want to run MSCO, then save everyone the trouble and money and simply have girls interview for the job. Treat it like a normal job interview or like an audition for a part in a play. Either way, it will still be more honest than what we saw in June.

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: AND YOUR NAME IS???? PLEASE TELL US. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Tuesday, July 02, 04:55:05pm

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: AND YOURS? TELL US PLEASE! You made mentioned to sitting in interviews and watching girls suck, NO what everyone witnessed is the winner's talent SUCKED and crown in competition were talent is the highest % factor. Someone should have advised her of another talent, therefore has open her up to this type of scrutiny. So the public isn't wrong for wanting answers, it's the ones who advised her. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Wednesday, July 03, 09:55:22am

[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: While there were NO perfect girl in every area but there was a MAO scoring system that ALL states should abide by, not the individual state criteria for who they deem best. Bottom the MAO guide lines was not followed. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Tuesday, July 02, 02:11:02pm >>The truth is Morgan probably had very high scores in >>interview and on stage question and she was way ahead >>of everyone. You can’t be a good Miss SC without >>that ! At the end of the day I want the speaker for >>the job of Miss SC . Now move on your DD did not win .

[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: While there were NO perfect girl in every area but there was a MAO scoring system that ALL states should abide by, not the individual state criteria for who they deem best. Bottom line the MAO guide lines was not followed. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Tuesday, July 02, 02:18:44pm >>>The truth is Morgan probably had very high scores in >>>interview and on stage question and she was way ahead >>>of everyone. You can’t be a good Miss SC without >>>that ! At the end of the day I want the speaker for >>>the job of Miss SC . Now move on your DD did not win >.

[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Same person keeps posting on several messages. They don’t understand the past tense of “was” is “were”. Give it up. Decision has been made. Move on. Author: No name [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Tuesday, July 02, 03:15:52pm >>>The truth is Morgan probably had very high scores in >>>interview and on stage question and she was way ahead >>>of everyone. You can’t be a good Miss SC without >>>that ! At the end of the day I want the speaker for >>>the job of Miss SC . Now move on your DD did not win >.