Author:
No name
[ Edit | View ]
|
Date Posted: Monday, July 22, 01:10:34pm
>>>Judges are charged to score as follows: 1,2,3 below
>>>average 4,5,6 average, above average 7,8,9,
>>>outstanding 10. Prelim scores precentages with
>highest
>>>and lowest dropped from a panel of 5 judges. Example:
>>>girl with strong interview&OSI getting 2nd in EG and
>>>weak/averg talent--interview 25% 10+10+10=30×2.0=60
>>>Talent 50% 5+5+5=15×5.0=75 OSI 15%
>>>10+10+10=30×1.5=45 EG 15% 10+10+9=29×1.5=43.5 total
>>>prelim points=223.5
>>>
>>>Girl with average interview OSI & EG but strong
>>>talent/prelim winner---interview 6+6+6=18×2.0=36
>>>Talent 10+10+9=29×5.0=145 OSI 6+6+6=18×1.5=27 EG
>>>6+6+6=18×1.5=27 total prelim points=235
>>>
>>>This is only one of many possible scenarios. If girl
>1
>>>was scored below average (1,2,3) for her talent, it
>>>would be extremely difficult for her to make the top
>>>15 out of 50+ contestants. Threes in talent drops her
>>>score by 30 points bringing her below the 200 point
>>>mark (60+45+45+43.5=193.5)
>>>
>>>Please note once you make the top 15 these prelim
>>>numbers are deleted and a composite score from each
>>>judge based on how that judge sees your overall
>prelim
>>>performance is given. The judge should stay
>consistent
>>>with their scoring and not elevate a contestant when
>>>assigning this score. Discussion is allowed in this
>>>meeting. Executive board is present. Composite is 25%
>>>of the score.
>>>
>>>So both contestants make the top 15. It is possible
>>>for judges to score girl with weak talent higher in
>>>composite because they felt she was strong in 3 of
>the
>>>4 categories. As it is to score a talent prelim
>winner
>>>lower because of being seen as average in 3 of the 4
>>>categories. (If MAO wanted a reality TV show,
>>>recording and airing this meeting would get them huge
>>>ratings)
>>>
>>>Girl 1 composite 9+9+8=26×2.5=65 girl 2 composite
>>>7+7+6=20×2.5=50 though girl one scored less than
>girl
>>>2 in prelim she is now 15 points ahead of girl 2
>based
>>>on assigned composite score before final competition
>>>even starts. This is why so many say the competition
>>>is won in interview. The judge falls in love and he
>>>gives you a pass on your poor talent. Basically you
>>>need enough points to make the cut to 15. Then you
>>>might move ahead just as above in composite scoring
>>>because you were so impressive in interview and your
>>>speaking ability on stage.
>>>
>>>Now on to final competition. Please note once a
>>>contestant is in top 15, judges are asked to not
>score
>>>below a 6 during final competition. Girl 2 will need
>>>to make up points to move ahead of girl 1 or anyone
>>>else scoring higher in composite. This is not likely
>>>because she would need to score 9s while girl 1 would
>>>need to score 7s. Remember they already like girl 1
>in
>>>her speaking abilities. This is why some say the
>>>judges meeting determines the top 10 and top 5.
>>>Placement among the 15 is hard to change post one
>>>category of competition. Meaning if you are placed
>>>12th it is not likely you will bump out 11 and 10
>>>after one category and move into the top 10.
>>>
>>>Girl 1 composite 65 talent 6+6+6=18×3.0=54 OSI
>>>10+10+10=30×2.5=75 EG 10+9+9=28×2.0=56 Total final
>>>score 250
>>>Girl 2 composite 50 talent 9+9+9=27×3.0=81 OSI
>>>7+7+7=21×2.5=52.5 EG 7+7+7=21×2.0=42 Total final
>>>score 225.5
>>>
>>>Girl 1 makes top 5 girl 2 does not. Note girl 2 fell
>>>behind even more as talent percentage decreased to
>>>30%. Top five scores are wiped clean and girls are
>>>given a final question that is not scored but viewed
>>>to help with the ranking of the final ballot. Judges
>>>are to rank from 1 being highest giving 10 points to
>5
>>>being lowest giving 0 points as to whom they feel is
>>>the best over all candidate for the job of Miss SC.
>>>Where this gets crazy is when the 1s are split among
>>>the judges. Basically anyone in the top five can come
>>>up on top. Judges are charged with staying consistent
>>>with ranking based on their scoring but judges are
>>>human and can have a change of heart when it comes to
>>>ranking. There are too many scenarios to post here
>and
>>>this post is long enough. I will leave you to play
>>>with numbers for final ballot and this final
>thought.
>>>
>>>It is not all about the scoring numbers in SC and
>most
>>>of you know that. Fund raising efforts are seen by
>>>judges during competition top 5 and awards are given
>>>out on stage. This may or may not have an effect on a
>>>judge consciously or subconsciously. Emphasis has for
>>>a number years has been on being the Miracle Maker.
>>>Whether anyone likes it or not fund raising plays a
>>>role in this competition. Tell me one Miss winner in
>>>the last 7 years that did not either sell the most ad
>>>pages, bring in a diamond sponsor or make top 5 for
>>>miracle maker.
|
Feedback: 