VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]34 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 00:31:25 11/14/03 Fri
Author: Egoli
Subject: Re: Historically Correct????
In reply to: TMoran 's message, "Historically Correct????" on 06:39:58 11/13/03 Thu

Terry,
Your boerboel, Basjan, complies with most of the features we want to see that makes up a historical correct boerboel.
1. Well built hindquaters
2. Good angulation
3. Good topline
4. Proud
5. Agile
6. Light footed
7. Not oversized head and body
8. Not overweight
9. Conformation correct
10. Muscular
11. Good temperament
12. Size within recommended guidelines

A boerboel needs to comply to above to have movement, etc.
Without these it can not be used as a working dog.
Egoli Boerboels

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:



[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.