VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, [10] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 23:28:37 10/08/11 Sat
Author: JJ (Ronda)
Subject: True, but I don't think their hissy fits would have stopped it if it had been on cable. Look at the shows that HAVE lasted on cable despite objections by various groups: Sex and the City, Mad Men, etc.
In reply to: jenks 's message, "I realize, JJ, that it wasn't just the parent group, but my point is that these groups need to back off and let the rest of the public decide. I really don't want, at 65, a parent group or a bunch of feminists dictating what I watch or choose not to watch. I think that Hef is right about the cable aspect, but then those same people would be having a hissy fit just the same." on 18:03:29 10/08/11 Sat


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.