VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, [10] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 06:32:33 04/02/10 Fri
Author: mj
Subject: All good points. And, no, I won't be a smidgen upset to see skin -- LOL! And, DJE, even in Secrets of a Sex Addict, has never done any gratuitous violence or sex. Some actors and their spouses and families can handle the 'steamy' sex or love scenes, for that matter. IMHO, intense LOVE scenes are a far more difficult emotive experience to deliver and not have collateral 'damage' from than sex scenes. Anyhow, as I was saying, some actors can handle it and some can't. If NM can't and pulled out -- great for him, if DJE can handle it and carries the role -- great for him AND us fans!!
In reply to: mj 's message, "I guess the scenes turned out to be raunchier to deliver than NM thought from his reading of the script. This can happen once shooting starts and you have a director yelling -- 'more grinding, more gyrating, more flesh' -- who knows. What i'm worried about is what all this press will do to our DJE's taking over of the role. inside" on 19:01:23 04/01/10 Thu


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> I must correct myself --- perhaps DJE's little stint in "The Shrink Is In' was a bit gratuitious. I never saw the movie - only the clips from these sites, so I can't say, for sure. It smacks of Coutrney Cox just wanting to check him out, though. Am I being unfair? -- mj, 08:51:07 04/02/10 Fri [1]


[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> Hid little "stint" was the ONLY highlight in that movie, IMVHO. -- jenks, 14:39:56 04/02/10 Fri [1]


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> That, of course, would be "his" -- jenks-who is trying to type with the cat sitting on her lap, 14:41:43 04/02/10 Fri [1]


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Ahem! Nothing about him is ever "little".... -- MizChief, 17:02:09 04/02/10 Fri [1]


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> Well, I haven't seen all of The Shrink is In (mostly just DJE's parts), but I seem to remember from past discussions that the movie was really kind of a farce and not to be taken seriously. So, I'd say that in the context of the movie and its intentions, it was not gratuitous. -- JAG Junkie (Ronda), 00:27:32 04/03/10 Sat [1]


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> The movie is not very well-constructed. It is okay up until the point DJE's character quits going to "the shrink" (Courteney Cox). After that, it's just one embarrassing moment after another. Horrible. The "farce" wasn't really the story line, but that Courteney and David Arquette (just recently married at the time) could make a rom-com with themsleves as the romantic interests. -- The Chief, 12:53:22 04/03/10 Sat [1]


[ Edit | View ]

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.